I have seen that though it's been a pandemic ago. Thanks for reminding me. I think the main takeaway and this goes back to the Fallon Fox discussion and so on and so forth is that Rogan, and others including myself, believe you can't even have a fucking discussion about any of this at all because the left will blow the fuck up. This even goes back to WAB and Gina Carano. People are getting fired from their jobs (booo hoo, she's a millionaire, I get it, but the point remains) because they have a fucking opinion and that's wrong. Ten Lubak will now tell me how horrible of a libertarian I am. As for that woman conflating physical gender and psychological gender. I'm not sure what you're talking about. Your DNA certainly does inform your gender, but there most definitely a psychological component as well. I don't think she was conflating anything, but more like explaining to the audience the nuance of the situation because JR has a diverse audience that includes people on the right like OF who may not understand these things. As for gender norms and learned behavior, eh, I played with my cousin's baby dolls as a kid and I'm heterosexual. My family is dominated by women. I grew up around women. I think we might find that some of that is just mumbo jumbo bullshit. I know I just defended psychology and I will to a certain extent, but I don't trust it completely because society and humans change quite a bit over time. As for your last paragraph, speculation and opinion. @Order2Chaos is right, Rogan is not going to ask the tough questions, he's an observer who's going to let the guest speak. IMO, there's nothing wrong with that, it's his appeal. Now I'll see your Joe Rogan clip and raise you this Joe Rogan clip which I haven't seen before. Sorry, this one is longer, but has more context. Edit: But we can't talk about any of this because the Dickynoo's of the world will flip out.
Nice to see FF doing the BBS equivalent of walking off, then walking back in and going "And ANOTHER thing....!!"
It's a discussion board, we're discussing things, it's an ongoing discussion, excuse me for not having everything I wanted to say upfront and also excuse me for thinking of things later on because I didn't think of them earlier. Also excuse me for doing more research as the discussion evolves.
All of this is to spite me? Nova and Tererun will be so flattered to have partaken in such a good faith discussion with you.
Said every crypto-fascist who ever fancied themselves the Monarch to my Dr. Venture, but they never went after anyone else like they did me. Nope, WAB and I get special attention. And clearly, I'm on your mind cuz you brought me up. (Bane voice) speak of the devil, and he shall appear!
Dude, you are a troll and a major attention whore. So is WAB. Do not bitch about getting attention when you run around demanding it so much. And yes it takes one to know one. I am not only able to identify my own kind, but I am also better at it than you to twats.
By "this shit," do you mean "medication that both the doctors and patients claim improves the patients quality of life, which is never prescribed unless the patients literally ask for it?" 1. Fuck you. 2. Why do you think age of consent laws for sexual activity cover more than just intercourse? Do you think laws that allow for sexual activity between minors but not between minors and adults exist for the physical health of the minors? Sure does sound like you're against hormone therapy in general. And yet you're also against the hormone blockers that would give the patients more time to make those decisions. Sure does sound like you want to make things harder for patients that decide in one particular way.
Yep, pretty much says it all there. Agenda driven, not science based. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-north-central-states/get-care/lgbtq-care
And reading just a tiny bit further gets you this information: You disingenuous sack of shit. And a little further down:
Yes you're right. I'm very much against giving kids drugs that the science is fairly new and are dangerous.
And in Oregon it's 15, no parents needed , Washington it's 13 and most states you don't need a note from a therapist, turd burglar.
Okay, chief, whatever you say. I'm being disingenuous because I question the dogma, fuck off. If your ideology is such that it can't be questioned or hold up to scrutiny, then you got some serious problems.
So has opioids, I still wouldn't want to give kids opioids. But you do realize you just inadvertently gave anti-vaxers a solid argument, right?
10 years. As a scientist, that's not "fairly new". CRISPR wasn't even a thing back then, and yet that's all over the fucking place now. We didn't even have 4G, for fuck's sakes. I'd only just bought my house. I've got just £45k of mortgage paid off in that period, so fuck you "fairly new".
You don't have questions, you have poorly considered objections that you're not seriously open to reevaluating.
Sure, if you discount the 25 years of research that led to the development of the technology, not to mention the nearly year long largest drug trial in human history to ensure that the vaccine is safe and effective. But antivaxxers aren’t interested in such things.
Hey Dr. Freud, have you searched my posting history and made up your mind that I'm a conservative because like @14thDoctor , you think you know me?
Yeah, but we know Federal Farmer will proudly defend that, because... https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/syria-child-marriage-young-girls-suicide/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23433537/
Oh no, you're unique and special and a free-thinker, not like the rest of the sheep. The fact that you regurgitate alt-right and FOX News talking points almost constantly is just a happy coincidence.
Quick, your kid refuses to eat their vegetables and will commit suicide if you make them, what do you do?