CRT tangent from political meme thread and Cis tangent from Musk thread

I thought it was always bad.

Because the government allowed it. What do you mean ‘why’? I thought you studied history?

Why should I be held responsible for something I had nothing to do with?

Yes. You alone are responsible.

Did you read my post?

Yes I read your post. Where do you think the government will get the money to pay for reparations?

Do you imagine it would be from you alone?

No I don't, but that's not the point. Nobody should be responsible for it. Nobody alive is a slave from that time and all of the slave owners are dead.

No one should be responsible? Not even the people who kidnapped and enslaved them in the first place?

So, west Africans?

yet their legacies still live...

If I crash my car into the side of someone's house, and then that person tries to fix the hole in their house, and a politician, indeed a whole political party, bans carpenters and repairmen from fixing that hole, and block any attempt at un-blocking them, wouldn't you start to think that bunch of politicians has a vested interest in keeping that crash hole there?
What about after I grow old and die, and my car is melted to slag in a junkyard?
Wouldn't you start to go "hey, can we fix that house with the car hole now?"?
Wouldn't you find it kind of fucking odd when politicians said "nahh, we like that hole there"?
Wouldn't you start to go "hmm...kinda fishy that "?

Cuz, the FF's of the world seem to be like "naahh, that's a garage. It's a fancy artsy garage with a broken sheet-rock and lumber motif. Matter of fact, its been there so long, it's part of our heritage ".

Yea. That’s right. West Africans are the sole reason chattel slavery happened and continued for 400 years. The West Africans ran the slave auctions long after the US outlawed kidnapping and importanting new slaves.

Jesus Christ. I don’t think I’ve ever met such a self centered pathetic excuse of a human being.

So you actually read the article and the ONLY issue was that a fellow anti-LGBTQ activist wasn’t allowed to take over a school board meeting?

Did you look up what happened? See he was off agenda, not following the prescribed process for flagging books AND was going to read allowed something he thought was inappropriate for HIGH SCHOOLERs to a room full of parents and kids of all ages AND being broadcast live (hey, he did say ‘kids cover your ears’… so… *shrug*).

Assume he is right and the passage (describing her rape as a teenager*) was ‘pornographic’** it is your belief that it should be read allowed in front of elementary school students?!?!?

That’s your position? That his first amendment rights to take over a school board meeting trump elementary school students not being exposed to ‘pornography’.

Huh. Interesting to know. Y’all really are all Groomers I guess.

*what is with conservatives REALLY not wanting kids to know about rape and consent? Oh wait, duh, I just said it.

**pornography is designed to excite. The fact that he thinks a description of a teenager being raped is exciting is… telling


https://www.news4jax.com/news/local...ents-of-school-book-makes-national-headlines/

They were never going to give over the platform no matter what protocols were or were not followed. It's a choice between being ignored or being heard.

I think the school board should have to look it right in the face when they endorse it.

And I thought you enlightened people believe it's fine and dandy to expose little kids to graphic material. Maybe it's only ok when it's kept secret from parents.

1. As has to be repeated, you don't give a fuck about kids, and we all know it, so I'm sick of hearing this phony lying put-on shit.
2. Is that why you're fucked up? L'il Albert snuck down and watched HBO past 8:00, and Sandahl Bergman's titties in Conan raped his brain?

I've explained to you plenty of goddamn times that my objection is the undermining of individual rights and free will. You are just choosing to pretend otherwise.

Whatever excuse you can use to avoid giving your opinion.

Bull fucking shit.

I gave it, but your autism is unable to sift out context.

FTFY

How fucking stupid are you? He was giving public comment. He would have had his three minutes if he had just followed the rules AND NOT TRY AND BROADCAST WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS INAPPROPRIATE FOR HIGH SCHOOLERS TO CHILDREN.

Note it was the school board’s attorney that cut the mic.

Children be damned.

Moron thinks school boards review every book in the library. Just the meeting prior they had established a six person committee to review all complaints about books.

AGE APPROPRIATE MOTHER FUCKER! THIS WAS IN A HIGH SCHOOL LIBRARY!

And just to be clear the school board had no idea what he was about to read except that he told kids to cover their ears. It could have been right out of Penthouse Letters for all they knew. And you think their proper response would have been to just let it play out?

It’s clear you don’t give a fuck about children you just hate LGBTQ folks.

What queer person hurt you so bad that you are willing to go through all these contortions to support hating on them?

Right. Everything but glowing praise and unconditional support is oppression. Twat.

Do they have a separate school board for every grade level? When is the appropriate meeting to bring up the creepy shit you want in the library? The answer is "never," of course.Might accidentally admit something you can't reel back in.

FOR THE THIRD FUCKING TIME YOU THICK FUCKING MORON YOU TAKE IT TO THE REVIEW COMMITTEE! THAT WHAT IT DOES! IT REVIEWS THE BOOKS!



Now, say the review committee doesn’t agree with you. Write a damn email to the school board with what you think the objectionable text is. If they don’t respond THEN sure show up to a meeting tell them you are disappointed in their lack of response, hand whoever is running the public comment copies for each member and tell the rest of the parents you have copies for them if they would like to see.

WHAT YOU DON’T DO IS BE A PUBLICITY SEEKING JACKASS AND TAKE OVER A BOARD MEETING SAYING ‘KIDS COVER YOUR EARS’ AND TRY TO READ ALOUD TO CHILDREN OF ALL AGES CONTENT YOU THINK IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR HIGH SCHOOLERS!



HOW FUCKING HARD IS IT FOR THE TINY LITTLE WHEELS INSIDE THAT TINY LITTLE BRAIN TO PROCESS THIS?!?!




They hurt you real bad didn’t they? Have you considered talking to a therapist about it instead of taking it out on all queer people?

Shove that up your ass too.
Does anyone glowingly praise each other here?
No.
Unless you count Nova getting winner reps for creaming you "glowing praise".
But to admit that would expose how jealous and petty and fragile you are, and your vanity can't countenance that.
So which is it?
Delusional strawman argument pulled out of your ass, or you're just a jealous snowflake?
Which do you think paints you in the less shitty light?

actually, sunshine, it's pretty much you who's consistently chosen to pretend otherwise in instances like this.

your claim that this is (or any of a number of subjects) is about free will is laughably empty

you get called on it by just about everyone, then double down and yell louder

I sometimes wonder if this is just a dayton level troll... but he'd show flashes of not being as dumb as he played and I doubt you can commit to a character as well.

case in point... everything is a binary with you where it's a choice between how victimized you are or how absurdly you've chosen to describe your boogieman.

and you still have the gall to wonder why nobody but feddy takes you seriously?

And then there have been dozens of occasions where you've shown your ass and established that all you actually object to is what you perceive as the rights most important to people like you, and your own free will, happily shining up the boot with your tongue when it's aimed at others.

A teacher mentioning they are married. Bad, fire the woke indoctrinating fuck.

A man standing up and saying he is a going to read porno to children: freedom hero, how dare he be censored.

I'm a very smart libertarian.

Reading ‘porn’* to small children is okay as long as it is in furtherance of keeping teenagers from learning about such things as consent and rape.

Where is @Fisherman's Worf with his libertarian quote?

*again, I don’t think an author’s description of her rape as a teenager to be porn, but…

of course the irony is that whatever he intended to read, it likely wasn't all that inappropriate in the first place.

the only thing that was shut down was a performance.