Dayton Kitchens B sides.

Apparently not.

Do you?

 

How would you feel if I insulted your writing career? Because I'm quite sure I feel as strongly about my church as you feel about that.

 

However Garamet is successful in her career, yet you're still "When I become head coach" for 15+ years, I doubt she'll find insults from a nobody like you to have any merit.

 

Explain to me how my lack of success magnifies someone else's achievements? And I'm curious as to why you seem compelled to insult me on her behalf?

 

You've insulted the careers of others several times, and at the same time you've been dismissed, noot had contracts renewed, disciplined, and haven't achieved the success you've been claiming you'll having for fifteen years. So before you start insulting the success of others, maybe you should work on your own.

 

You say that as though half of garamet's detractors haven't made dumb quips about that Probe book over and over since she announced who she was in real life.

I say this with no irony whatsoever: Dayton might be the most codddled poster here since Tamar's pet retard Ted Wolf. And like I'm sure will one day be the case for Dayton, he too bit the hand that fed him.

But Tamar for whatever reason actually saw good in the guy. There's no there there with Dayton.

He's insulting you because of you, ya knob.

 

Once again, you didn't explain how my lack of success magnifies what anyone else here has achieved.

 

IIRC I insulted her book "Probe" (which was not very good in my opinion) because of her attitude. The "I didn't write it and what I did write was better" I found supremely annoying.

 

Even *I* sided with T'Bonz which should tell you something.

 

Why?

 

Because you were trolling and you were doing so in very poor taste.

Please proceed, Governor

 

I wasn't trolling. IIRC I had a source that talked about how a powerful hurricane striking New Orleans could kill 20-25.000 people. Against that the 2,000 or so who died resulting from Katrina wasn't nearly as bad.

How is that trolling?

 

To be honest, I forgot that you were one of her loudest detractors.

Did you get banned over there?

 

we need borgs back so can be our minisral

 

Thank you! the Sufficient Velocity thread should get an Emmy.

What happened to the thread title? It's lame (maybe that's the point).

 

Yeah, and, to be honest, I don't remember what the last straw was, but I probably deserved it.

 

Best Actor in a Persecuted Role?

Meh. Dayton wins that every year.

 

"If"? You still can't grasp the meaning of the term "midlist."

 

Nobody here is willing to engage you over an argument you lost 15 years ago.

 

We’ve been over this before and it’s simply untrue.
Livestock don’t form families in the same way humans do. Trying to equate your herd experience with human family structure is just false and frankly insulting to all bipeds.

 

Holy shit an actual forum full of internet lawyers. That place sounds awful.

 

Love how @Dayton Kitchens comes in there thinking he's going to win with his psuedo-intellectual bullshit and then proceeds to get absolutely destroyed

 

it truly does make you the posterchild for what makes America's educational system a worldwide joke.
you can recite dates and events, but as evidenced for years here, understand nothing of their cause or effects.

 

Dates and events are kind of important.

 

why and how are more so.

another basic notion you fail to grasp.

 

"I'm old fashioned. I think there are evil people in the world. And if you kill 10 evil people then the world is 10 people better. This colors all my reasoning from the death penalty to warfare. To me this is a no brainer that requires no explanation." - Dayton Kitchens. Sufficient Velocity Forums, June 2016.

Never declare support for unilateral punishment of evil in a forum where everyone thinks you are the one that is evil By Daton's logic, Sufficient Velocity became one person better when they banned him.

 

for a self declared historian, he sure gets a lot of the bases wrong.
not even in a challenging way either... like, there's no counter argument, just the simplest possible reversal as shown in this quote mangling the Blackstone Formulation of "Better ten guilty escape than one innocent be destroyed".

 

I didn't intend to reflect the idea from that quote at all.

 

For the record I liked having Chup around to argue with.