Going away party for Paladin

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by MikeH92467, Jun 27, 2022.

  1. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,684
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,915
    I can decide all I want. My opinions are not subject to what 12 people and a judge basing opinions on political winds decide.
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,684
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,915
    FOLLOW THE FUCKING CONVERSATION OR GTFO
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    No, it is an established precedent that the police are under no obligation to protect you or, by extension, your property. I expect the pertinent tax-funded public servants to investigate, apprehend and prosecute.

    *edit*
    I misread that. I want you should either say they aren't hurting anyone, or expose your application of double standards.

    Disagree. I say there is no place for people who cannot be trusted to handle firearms responsibly.

    Same as anyone else, I would speculate. They decided there were shenanigans afoot and this was the only way they could think of to exert any control over it. Look for more of that kind of shit as people continue to lose faith in the political process. Will I be doing that? Hell fucking no I won't. I'd be considered a Nazi by default just for being a bald white guy, and I'm not looking to get Rittenhouse'd.
  4. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    And reality is not subject to your feelings concerning it.
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  5. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,684
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,915
    Doesn't change the fact that 2 people are dead by his hand and a 3rd is disabled.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    And they are suffering those consequences because they thought they could grant themselves permission to attack anyone who didn't play along with their riot party.
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 2
  7. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,684
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,915
    What?! Now you're just being stupid. They didn't attack him because he "didn't play along". They were attempting to stop an active shooter.
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  8. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,515
    Ratings:
    +82,454
    I dunno, every time I've seen you try to walk and chew gum, you've choked.
    :diacanu:
  9. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    Also, it was a SEMI-automatic rifle.
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  10. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    No they fucking weren't. None of the visual evidence supports that.
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  11. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,827
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,743
    He was approached in a threatening manner, and the first gunshots heard were not his.

    They were attempting to attack someone who was exposed as "the enemy."

    Then your feelings on the matter also have no place.

    No, he actually did put out a fire. With a fire extinguisher. Which is why he was confronted and attacked.

    Derail the destruction and looting you mean.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  12. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,781
    Ratings:
    +31,765
    I am following the conversation. You cannot show me where I said it's acceptable to waste other people's money and time on religious topics in a science class. Then you turned towards personal attacks in an attempt to distract me and now you're getting angry because you can't seem to follow the conversation and I'm calling you out on it and you don't like that.
    • Fantasy World Fantasy World x 2
  13. Spaceturkey

    Spaceturkey i can see my house

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    30,589
    Ratings:
    +34,168
    yeah, sorry. I've got this annoying habit of being consistent about this sort of thing. Oddly for exactly the reason you state... that any bunch of armed yahoos "defending" a polling station is going to undermine the election in that district.

    Also, you might wanna rethink what you're paying for cops for then... Our Supreme Court seems to have upheld a duty to protect. Yet another piece of America that doesn't function, I guess. If we had a polling station threatened the place would have a dozen cops from local, provincial, and likely the goddamned RCMP present.



    It's problematic that there are armed civilians at a polling station

    It's also problematic that they can come up with an excuse

    See? Escalation just by the presence of firearms in public.

    Also, I believe under those conditions the concern is more about you Rittenhousing than being housed...
    • Agree Agree x 3