Hearing Set For Class Action Lawsuit Against DNC

Uh, no one's ignoring that. If anything, we're having a laugh at how the Democrats did the exact same thing, yet it's being defended.

And yet it didn't matter - the nomination had already been decided in both cases.

Another class action suit against the DNC. This one is from field workers who haven't been paid for work performed.

http://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-class-action-lawsuit-field-organizers-convention-bonuses/

Because we were hoping someone would bring some sense back to the Democratic Party.

https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/06/wasserman-schultz-voice-changer/

I saw that over at City Data Forum and if true, which I would like independent confirmation, this woman is stupid as can be.

Milo Yiannopoulos' website is saying Debbie Wasserman Schultz called using a voice changer, but didn't hide her phone number from caller ID.

... Yea ... I'm gonna believe that one.

Werent republicans conspiring to deny Trump the nomination? Yes they were. So shut up.

So, how exactly did the DNC use its influence to put Hillary ahead of Bernie, as is the claim?

Voice changer, not number changer.

Read the thread then get back to us. I hate repeating myself.

I have read the thread. And I'm still at a loss as to how the DNC directly affected the primary polling. So feel free to summarize.

I don't care for populist of any type, I am a bit like Joe Scarborough on that one. Don't either care for ssanders or trump methods.

If you're going to hide your voice, why not hide your number as well?

Well, I guess you would be stupid enough if it were you then. However, most people who would feel the need to use a voice changer would also think to disguise their number as well.

The parts where you speak English, I'm guessing

Booze is a helluva drug.

That makes at least ten to fifteen of us, given your lack of reading comprehension is even worse than Dayton' s analytical scores on his Praxis exam.