I am wondering if people can critique this.

I have seen first hand how these animals live and the truth is trash piles up every where they go and not one of the sub-humans cares. They just live in it even when trash cans are right there and are completely empty.

Just Google and you will find the great heaps of trash these animals leave every where they go. Oh, and you are an idiot for not knowing the dirty animals use their left hands to wipe their asses. No toilet paper at all.

A coward, huh? How many wars have you served in? I have served in two so you can go fuck yourself with that coward shit. I wonder how well you would hold up if you were in a war.

It is not racist to say people with shit on their hands are dirty people. It is just reality even if you do not like it.

Yeah yeah yeah. You forget that I am well traveled in the Middle East, and I'm talking about having been to more places than just a bombed to shit warzone.

I didn't know Europe had roadside hoses from Greece all the way to Sweden.

I know the region mostly uses trenches in the bathrooms (really nice ones in the Gulf states) because our forces had to adapt to those during early deployment in the Gulf War, but I hadn't heard more on their bathroom habits. I knew North Africans wiped with their right hand because our forces in Somalia were told to always shake with the left hand because the right hand is the wiping hand and extending it is a serious insult.

Europeans wipe with their right pinky, which is why it can never touch food or drinking glasses in polite company. They have to leave it sticking conspicuously out when they're eating and drinking or someone will beat the living shit out of them or never invite them back.

Of course it's racist....not only because it's not true, but your widening your bigotry beyond religion to include culture, nationality and ethnicity.

Besides, I know it's not fucking true because I've been to three times as many Muslim majority countries as your one warzone. But according to you in places like Morocco, Oman, the UAE, Iran & Tunisia they're wiping their arses with their hands. Yeah, ok.

You're either just plain trolling or lying, or judging people who have been on the poverty line.

You want people who have disgusting toilet habits, go to India - and even then it's only the poor.

GT, it is their left hands which they wipe their asses with and it is an insult to touch anything with your left hand among the barbarians. They also use gobs of perfume to cover up their stench.

Dirty is an understatement.

Chup, I agree Indians have the nasty habit of just shitting every where. On the street, in the field, any place they can find. It is no wonder disease is so rampant there with their horrible sanitation.

I guess you got me there. I did not know there was a picture of a white person cleaning on the internet.

On a serious note, do you think if we showed a picture of thousands of peaceful muslims who have never hurt anyone being all clean and nice to each other Dinner would STFU?

People can suck for lots of different reasons. Some Muslims have shit on their hands. Some Muslims have blood on their hands. Could be colon cancer. Could be hemorrhoids. Could be a jihadist from a war zone.

They cater to rich tourists who wear cuff links. They're very class conscious. When Marine air units deployed to the UAE during the Gulf War the powers that be put the Marine officers in some posh hotel with gold faucets and put the enlisted guys in tents where they could shit in a hole that they'd have to dig themselves, because in that culture there's a vast social distinction between officers, who come from well-to-do families, and riff raff and scum who aren't officers. It took the Marines several days to straighten out the misperception about how our culture works. The Marine fighter pilots only found two Muslim pilots who were willing to train with them because in that culture, grown men do not accept teaching because to be "taught" is to be subservient and unmanly. But the two pilots who would train with them became damn good.

So says the pinky wiping European.

The extended pinky is actually an interesting trait that came from Italy long ago. They wiped with the right pinky but ate meals out of a communal pot where everyone around the table had to reach in. The wiping pinky cannot touch food, as if it's coated in nuclear waste. The habit spread throughout Europe at some point, and it illustrates that table manners are extremely conserved because children learn them before they can fully reason and innovate, much like childhood games like Red Rover, which dates to the Viking invasions, or Ring Around the Rosies which goes back to the Black Death.

The Russians used to spot American agents because of the way we use our forks upside-down in our left hands and then swap them to the right hand to pick up the meat. We do that because the early Colonials didn't have forks because Britain was still trying to meet domestic demand. So we just had knives and spoons. And American can eat a steak with a knife and spoon and hardly have to change a single motion. I've done it many times.

All later immigrants copied how we eat because when a lower-status person gets invited to an upper-status persons home for dinner, they slavishly observe and follow the etiquette because they're uncomfortable and trying to make a good impression, and show that they too are higher-status. Such people's descendants later produced the 64-bit microprocessor, and at some point they should perhaps produce a Youtube video titled "Pooping. How we do it in the West."

No, because according to him there is no such thing. He says that all Muslims are welfare seeking savages who believe in the exact same thing and are all coming to kill him. So, ya know, must be true n'all.

In all honesty, I have not had the desire or reason to go to war and kill people. There is a difference between bravery and being violent. Serving in wars so you can kill some type of person you hate is violence not bravery. It also may denote cowardice when you have the ability to kill without facing danger.

Unless you are talking ground troops in vietnam, you were not not in the same amount of danger. I would give ISIS far more credit there as we can kill them in their homes without giving them a target or defense. Their defense tends to be not being there because when they are in the area of a strike they are going to die unless the US military doesn't bring enough firepower by mistake.

Now, I know it is paintball and all, but I would imagine the rush and fear one feels being the suicide shooter behind enemy lines is only amplified when dealing with real deadly bullet. There is no front line situation like that I can tell you. Knowing you can walk away instead of opening fire on overwhelming odds just gives cowardice a boost. I have been in those situations with a team behind enemy lines. For the scenario we were well known which means people recognized us sometimes like a white man in the middle east. That is fear in a paintball game, but with real bullets that is where fear is probably stronger. Pushing up with a fortified group on a undergunned and undermanned front line or post is not exactly courageous in my book.

I have seen this sort of things before. It is called paranoia.

People fear what they don't understand, etc, etc.

Most of them really are. Do you doubt that the vast, vast, vast majority of those migrants are not on welfare or that they will not remain on welfare for decades to come? That is the main reason they targeted certain countries, namely, the ones with the most welfare.

Oh, many of us do indeed understand Islam quite well and more and more people are learning every day. It is indeed an evil fascist religion.

Short term, refugees inevitably will be. Long term, no the vast majority will not be on benefits. In fact, the benefits paid out to migrants in Britain accounts for a very small fraction of overall benefits claimants, and even then about a third of the Claimants are people from other EU nations, not refugees from warzones. You know, white, Christian people. The vast majority of immigrants work, and work hard, once they have permission to work - and that includes the vast majority of refugees in the UK. I've been an immigration lawyer for 17 years and you can't come close to having the knowledge I do on this subject, especially when you get your "facts" from blogs and youtube videos. I've seen people literally work all hours of the day to build a life and a future for their families and contribute to the state over and over again, year after year, and many of them have been Muslim. Yet again, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about....and it's because I know the true facts that I'm not going to be swayed by your racist garbage.

Yeah, meanwhile there is no such thing as "it". There is no singular version of Islam, just as there isn't one single version of Christianity.

So you understand lots it seems.........except for the very basics.

He read the Koran, didn't you know? But still thought that it was in chronological order.

I would view it a bit differently, as would many non-violent Muslims. The Mecca Koran is full of goodness and other sweet nonsense that most Muslims probably taught their children once the initial wave of violent conquest was over, and you had a bunch of Muslims sitting around with no obvious targets to kill. Among those people, the Medina Koran was viewed probably much like we view the punishments and rules laid out in Leviticus, an embarrassing look back at the weird crap earlier people believed.

But Muslims are also taught that every word in the Koran comes directly from God, and that the Hadith is the best example of how a Muslim should think and act. Shift Muslims from their comfortable support structures back home, stick them in European ghettos, and let them reconnect with Islam online and they're going to hit tons of posts by Muslims who adhere to the Medina Koran and the most violent passages from the Hadith. The result will not be pretty, because the Medina Koran is a self-justification for a young angry male to do the worst things a young angry male can think of. It's a bit worse than I imply because the radicalization of Muslims really took off in the late 1950's and throughout the 1960's, and then kept spreading. When you go back and look at films of that era they look like Hollywood films translated into Arabic. And then it all came crashing down.

Islam has a big red reset button under glass that says "Smash Here to Return to the Seventh Century" and they press it a lot. Christians and Jews, on the other hand, will never try to invoke the laws in Leviticus ("an eye for an eye") because we've moved on, because we don't think the entire Bible was handed to us by God. We know it was a work by many authors and heavily edited by people who were trying to grasp possible meanings. We had to do that so we could preserve free will instead of becoming enslaved to bizarre rules laid out in an ancient text. Muslims can follow the same path, and many do, but there's the problem of the violent bearded idiots who want to hack people's heads off for thinking new, innovative, and dangerous thoughts.

Ooooh, lookie, I've found a video one of this ISIS fighter refugees desperate for benefits!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35058733


Of course, the guy in the video is clearly lying about his experiences.

I am sorry facts do not matter to you. BTW I am talking about Germany and Sweden not the UK as the British government has been smart enough not to allow in these vermin. Also, I hear old David has a good plan to kick most of the noncitizens welfare migrants off the rolls even the EU ones. That is as it should be and only people who have paid into the system should benefit from the system.

Yeah, the fighting-age Muslim male always survives when his wife and seven children are in danger.

Would you bet the life of your family on the word of an Arab human smuggler's knowledge of seamanship?

I'm not really identifying with this character.

Except that the UK Government is allowing them in, and Britain isn't removing support for refugees while their claims are considered. So once again you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

You don't have the facts at all. You don't work in this field. You just read shit from the media and blogs - and cherry pick only the media and blogs that suit your agenda - and regurgitate them here.

Very, very few (a few tens of thousand) and not the flood of 1-1.5 million Germany stupidly let in.

I love how you always try to spin things and pretend people don't know things they have already written about and posted links to before.

I think it is a little bit different than that, but close enough.

One, muslims are quite capable of learning and adapting. Second, you are attacking poverty here. Letting poor people die on their own is really not a good way to kill them off. It seems you just end up with a lot more poor people that way.

Yes, because the best way to learn about a culture is to go over there and shoot at them.

I don't need to spin what I know from 17 years of first hand experience compared to your third hand political blog nonsense. Oh, but you posted "links".

You can't even answer half the questions put to you and your "links" are videos of piles of trash that apparently created by Muslim refugees because someone typed it in text below the video. Yeah, you're really advancing your credibility there.

So when you complained that refugees weren't working but living off welfare, you chose a country that forbids them to work or earn any money by law?

That is only for a few months from what I have read. Supposedly they can get temperary approval while their case is pending then after their case is cleared they, of course, could work though most will not. Part of that is virtually all of them are unskilled and uneducated and part of that will be because they don't want to work.