It's gone!

You added the point of making it a theoretical discussion, and then insisted it was a real offer.

Trust is based on a far more sensitive scale. Whether one is happy go lucky or not, is not a deciding factor. I do not trust you. Our discussion of this subject is over.

-J.

What's your demonstrated purpose, UA?

Certainly not to annoy...is it?

While I completely disagree with Face's lame "it's not his fault it's ours" line of illogic, I also must say that ideally, the best solution whort of an arbitrary ban for Zodiac is for all rational people to ignore him - completely.

The only goal of the internet troll, as we all know, is to provoke a reaction.

When no reaction is forthcoming, he'll get bored and go away.

Remember when a particularly ridicule worthy post or thread occured and we all started replying to it with discussions of pie? It seems to me that if Zodiac's "hypotnetical" was met with the same reaction it would take all the fun out of it for him.

It may be true that this stunt points out to the managment that the CR was ill-concieved...I'll leave that for others to debate. But I certainly wouldn't have given him the satisfaction of all this negative reaction.

In fact, the best thing to do MIGHT have been to PM all the CR memebers that the photos were being taken down and why and also have a thread in there about it (so there wouldn't be a thread here in THD about it).

And then let the more juvinille among us stew about the fact that they can't get in to see the boobie pics that - unbenkownst to them - were no longer there.

Then we could all laugh at his expense instead of vice-cersa.

I find the outcry about losing access to titties on the internet amusing...if not completely backwards.

exactly. They were boobies of people I like.

I DID send you a message on your myspace... :wink:

I think the outcry wasn't so much about losing access to titties as it was about a vocal minority ruining the fun of a naked majority.

Could the minority be vocal because they were excluded?

"Minority" ?

May I ask, who exactly was given access?

Just about everyone but you, face, and any known other trouble maker.

I guess. Why do you suppose they were excluded?

White people.

If that's true, why are a decent number of people just now finding out about its existence, Mr. Walczak?

"I demand the right to troll you with your naked photos! :tantrum: "

Because they hadn't bothered to check their UserCP's.

Well, they weren't terribly vocal. At least not enough that I noticed.

I see. So would you say that the group which hadn't checked their CPs outnumbered those who had... ?

Would it be possible to see a list of those who had access?

Before closing, the room had 74 members, it's not exactly like it was a freakin secret.

Why is this clown still being treated like a human being?

I don't know. No one told me why.

Did I wander onto a board devoted to Kindergarten girls?

What a bunch of freaking crybabies.

"Orf with'is'ead! Orf with'is'ead!"

Don't play into him.

The proper answer is, "No. I will not tell you who was on the list."

Actually, the proper answer is. "No, it is none of your business who was on the list."

An excellent standard for the future. Put me back on probation why don't you if you're not ready to give me my privileges back.

*sigh*

I'm pretty sure that if I were making comments like this, I'd be warned. Is that what people are waiting for? M.A.D. ?

Insults are now allowed in the help desk???

Was the entire group that hadn't making a fuss?

Hence the term "vocal"?

Okay, there is no more reason for this thread to be open. The Champagne Room is closed, the end.

Some warnings were handed out in this thread.

I don't care who the recipient is, this is the Help Desk and not the place for hurling insults and trolling just because your mad at someone.

We have the Red Room which serves that purpose well. Exercise control when in here, or you will be warned.

That's all.