No this thread isn't about polarslam's latest trip to the states These two fine, upstanding gentlemen obviously just came to this country to make better lives for their families.
I believe one poster here is Honduran in origin. I do not believe she has raped anyone. Therefore I do not understand your point. Explain.
Well, if we actually enforced the borders instead of suing states that try to and if we tried to capture and deport fucks like these instead of setting up "sanctuary cities", we might have at least one, almost certainly many many non traumatized people. Yes, I know citizens and lehals do this shit too, but without the illegal shit we'd have less crime and less victims.
Perhaps not, but I would like to know if her birthplace might result in the world being at risk of sudden sexual aggression. Statistically speaking, not all sudden attacks by females are pleasant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG0tL8TF7lA
Well, yes. The wall is to prevent the underage girls from escaping. Yet. They're certainly showing potential.
Should build the wall either way. Illegal immigration or not. There are a lot of drugs and other shit that is going back and forth because of the unmanned border.
The only drug the Pope brings with him is the opiate of the masses. And since there seem to be plenty of 'forgers on the Methamphetamine of the masses, i.e. Leftist politics, let's not hear any bitchin'.
In another universe, you're an intelligent being. In this one, you're not. No explanation will change that.
This isn't an off-shoot of the "if enforcing against illegal immigration doesn't stop rape everywhere by everyone, then it's not worth it" argument, is it?
Of course it is. Because that's the only way arguing against enforcing immigration law works. If not the "they're exempt because they're brown people from a third world shithole!" race card doesn't work -- not that they'll give it up as long as it dupes a few gullible people here and there -- then they trot out the "well, it isn't 100% effective, so we shouldn't do it at all!" ploy. Ignoring, of course, that the majority who use that argument with illegal immigration toss metaphorical molotovs at abstinence-only dupes for arguing from the very same principle.
Yes, and yes. And what's more, you know it does. Everyone here has seen it, so denying it is not only pointless, it makes you look like a retard. Compared to teh baba.
That's special, because it hasn't happened. You're either pathologically dishonest or more than a bit slow. I shan't pass judgment on which.
Good, then Skin won't point out what a paisley-pantied pansy-ass you are for using the word "shan't" outside the 19th century, ya empty-headed fuckin' derp-fish.
In, what, the last half an hour? In every thread you've started on the subject (three in recent memory) you've defended this brand of criminal by claiming those who want the law enforced are xenophobes on the one hand, and that enforcing the law is pointless on the other. So bull us all some more shit, sis.