Exactly. If the battle is left to Muslims they'll still be milling around a decade from now. A lot of real boots will have to go in. We don't need much bombing, just tactical air strikes in support of ground troops. Think of the battles for Fallujah and other cities in Iraq.
Putin is elected. He enjoys more popular support than Barrack Obama. Everyone knows this. But, this doesn't matter. The person in question asked me what I would support. I answered.
By the way, I don't think ISIS is hoping for a reaction that would wipe them off the face of the Earth.
At least 100 more dead at the theater, as terrorists detonated bombs when the police stormed the place.
One problem that's going to pop up is that if the West really starts crushing the ISIS held areas, some of the million Muslims who just walked into Europe are going to strike back.
No, they are trying to spread panic to soften up the promised land(s). In some other post I mentioned how I'd do it (blow up a few malls on Christmas shopping days). This could be an overture. Today, everybody stands with the French. Tomorrow, the bickering will begin. The bad guys know that. They MUST be proven wrong for once.
Actually, they are. It's part of their role in bringing about the apocalypse that results in the direct intervention of Allah to smite all the heretics and apostates. ISIS backers talk quite a bit about how they have to bring about the end times with their own martyrdom in huge battles against Western forces. We're fighting a death cult.
Who are our resident muzzie-lovers & sympathizers? It goes hand-in-hand with progressive liberalism (even though cultural equivalence Aurora? RickDeckard? Dan Leach? Garamet? The time has come to stop giving a shit about what people like you think. This is war. In war, there is collateral damage. Innocents will die. So be it. We must send a clear message that hiding among non-combatants will no longer provide safety.
They are woefully mistaken. They are retarded enough to antagonize the Russians. Good fucking luck to them. The Russians murdered the Nazi invading force during World War Two despite suffering an enormous technological disadvantage. Let's see how they handle these cunts if they feel prompted to really get started.
I'm trying to wrap my mind around the whole Islamic terrorist mindset. From my POV it seems like "misery loves company." Their religion (or their interpretation of it) seems to be lacking any vestige of optimism, joy, tolerance, reason, tolerance, or humanity. Thus they want the rest of the world to be as miserable and willing to die as they are. Funny though, 100 French people are experiencing the worst day of their lives - but these extremist shit stains have never had (and never will have) one day of peace and joy in their entire short and miserable lives. Everybody has to die eventually - it's how you live that matters. Is there any upside top being an Islamic terrorist other than a pipe-dream of fucking heavenly virgins? Fucking amazing.
Somehow I don't think Russian state security would be giving ISIS members Korans and prayer mats like we do at Gitmo.
You little shit could start by reading my postings concerning the IS. Would save you some (more) humiliation.
Foaming? You think this is something easy for me to say? Fuck you. Fuck you to hell. If you said that to my face, you'd end up in intensive care. I'm serious.
Will today's events ensure a Trump presidency? Illegal immigration and securing the borders is his issue. He's the one saying to build a wall. Will this spell the end of tolerance for progressives who don't believe in the concept of borders or sovereign nations being entitled to control who enters their population? Will the Mizzou hunger strike kid stop eating to demonstrate solidarity for any black ISIS victims?
Bullshit. This is not an existential threat requiring that we kill millions to protect ourselves. People are rightly angry, and the response certainly should include finding and killing terrorists. But that's tens of thousands, not tens of millions. And when the threat to us is a few hundred now and then, there is no justification for massive collateral damage. Boots on the ground, tactical air support, occupation for a few decades, all of that might be necessary. Slaughtering innocents? Absolutely not.
Europe is the promised land. Not Russia. They know that Russia is in this only to grab a better foothold in the Med. Once Assad is secure in the coastal regions, the Russians are going bye-bye. Putin couldn't care less about the IS. If it spreads to southern Russia, he'll crack down there.
That's how we can fuck with them in the end. When their backs are to the wall in Jerusalem, we produce a giant hologram of Elvis and the entire Muslim worldview implodes.
The problem for them being that Western Europe, if mobilized, would wipe the floor with them without even trying.
There's an estimated 140 dead in Paris, and the explosives and weapons seemed to be pretty sophisticated. So what are the odds that among those million Muslims who walked in were a lot of backpacks that never got searched?
Chad is just channeling Garamet's Polanski logic, that anyone wanting to see him finally brought to justice is nothing but a zealot who wants a celebrity show trial and media circus. If you want justice for French victims, you're "foaming at the mouth."
