The Biden Cabinet and Administration

reading comprehension not your thing? The echo chamber thing is the perception of people at TK, not me. The main group here is an MSNBC echo chamber which I would not call left. I would call it fox left. But, it is clear you do not understand as your perception is as limited as oldfella or tuttle.

Biden is not what we need now. Biden is what the rich white men need now. We includes everyone even though you do not.

Biden's administration is full of diversity and a lot of women, but what good is diversity if it's the same old corrupt people from the Obama administration? Women can do anything men can do, including being corrupt corporate shills.

Jen Psaki, I remember her lying ass. She helped pushed the "Benghazi was a result of a YT video" bullshit.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/28/us/politics/biden-westexec.html

Oh and tell me more about how Biden won't take us to war or dig us deeper into the wars we've already started. And @RickDeckard is right, he might not start another war (though I wouldn't put it past him), but he'll most certainly dig us deeper in the shit we're already in. Here's another prediction; the MSM will cheer it on as they always do, especially MSNBC. Get ready to see those hypocrites change their tune.

https://jacobinmag.com/2020/11/joe-biden-administration-cabinet-picks-pro-war-hawks

^ Biden hasn't even taken office yet and Federal Farmer is already roasting him harder than he roasted Trump in 4 years

What a partisan hack

typical.

"Here's my prediction"

posts article and/or YT link

Would you rather me not support my post with an article to back it up? Did you even read what I posted or did you just want to make snarky comment and be an asshole? Same question goes to @Ten Lubak

Yeah, fuck yerself instead, link boy.

Do you read them? Understanding not withstanding?

Also, been meaning to ask for a while why the passive aggressive, potentially race baiting shade at Leonard Peltier (AKA the actual "Spirit of Crazy Horse") with your current screen name? Martin Luther Queen taken?

Generally speaking, unintelligent partisan hacks such as yourself are only worthy of snarky comments and not to be taken seriously

I can see you two are not worth engaging anymore since everything I post you're not even going to bother reading and are just going to be an asshole. No I'm not a partisan hack, I don't take sides. As for my user name, @Spaceturkey this will be the last civil discussion I'll be having with either of you so I'll answer your question. I have no idea what you're talking about and I don't know who Leonard Peltier is. It's just a name I came up with.

LOL

Just embrace it dude, it'll probably garner you more respect

Jacobin: There are people here who have governmented before. This is unacceptable, only people who don't government can fulfill our agenda.

Had to google Leonard Peltier. I knew I'd heard the name before, just couldn't remember where. Now, I'm sad.

It's funny how people who claim to be non-biased always seem to land about 90/10 on the side of Republicans rather that 50/50 (or close) which would more accurately reflect a non-biased position.

whatever you say, Susan B Agony.

but once again I guess it takes a Canadian to educate you on American history...

so there's a book you can read, and hey! a link to a video...


Not to mention the actual Crazy Horse's legacy...

I'm aware of AIM and what went down at Wounded Knee, the second one.

yet you claim you came up with the Crazy Horse ref all on your own?

not buying it

Everyone knows who crazy horse, the real crazy horse is. So of course I didn’t come up with the name crazy horse. Even your fellow Canadian, Noel Young didn’t come up the name Crazy Horse when he named his band, but The Ghost of part I came up with. I came up with it nearly a decade ago.

"Neil"

He acknowledged Crazy Horse.

Likewise, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse has been associated with LP for 45 years.

If, as you say you are aware of his story, you'd know that.


Of course, you're just being coy and I'm playing along... but don't think anyone can't see what a race baiting dipshit you are being.

He may have a BA in Liberal Arts, but he didn't take to any of those crazy liberal ideas like ... the US mass murdering native residents of this continent.

So FF finds Jacobin a reliable source...

Good to know.

I didn’t say I was aware of his story, I said I’d heard of AIM and the FBI shootout at wounded knee. How did I come to know this? There was a Val Kilmer movie that had similar elements. But since you think I’m a chronic liar. Go to this website.
https://historum.com/ I go by the same user name. Look at the profile and the join date and my posts and tell me if you still think I’m lying. I haven’t posted in a long time and I don’t post there much, but you should have all that you need.

I love how you think you know me. I'm well aware of the mass killing of Native Americans in this country. I've even posted a few times about and I've even been to Little Big Horn, but I suppose I have to prove everything I say now because @Spaceturkey questions it?

Do you want to tell him who’s behind the site?

I’m old enough to remember when @RickDeckard would get dragged for posting WSWS articles and the Comrade Kid over here holding up Jacobin!

I forgot that you're one of those morons who like to shit on the source and not the content of the source. Why don't you try reading what they said.

I'm speaking of the posts you've made today in this this thread. @Spaceturkey told you about a man who has recently been referenced as "the spirit of Crazy Horse" and the horrific treatment he has received by our government, but instead of showing any sympathy for the man, you immediately discount all of it and make excuses for your choice in username.

It's not your username that is the problem, it's your lack of sympathy, let alone any empathy.

I’m just curious, which of their editorial positions do you most identify with:

• Rejection of anti-communism
• Skepticism regarding the possibility of the Democratic Party being transformed into a social-democratic movement through internal pressure, advocating instead the formation of a mass-based independent labor party
• Criticism of the parties of the Socialist International, which they argue have been responsible for imposing neoliberal austerity policies
• A conviction that the Nordic model of social democracy is ultimately not viable and that the only alternative to capitalism would be for militant labor and socialist movements to struggle to replace capitalism with socialism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobin_(magazine)

If the source wished to have their content taken seriously, then they need to ALWAYS publish articles that should be taken seriously. Otherwise, it's just like the kid who cried wolf.

He specifically doubted that I came up with my user name and accused me of race bating. It most certainly was about my user name and his problem with it.

None, so what?