I can't believe 62 million people fell for this fraud.... WHITE PEOPLE... WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? I wonder how that audit's going?
this has been referenced in the "mueller probe" thread. It probably deserves its own. My honky friends and I take full responsibility for believing Trump.
More than just white people voted for the orange buffoon. Your comment makes me a bit uncomfortable. It's like you're saying only white voters can vote for an idiot. How do you explain things like this... https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/18/politics/poll-of-the-week-trump-black-voters/index.html?
Nothing new here, just a repackaging of things that have been known for years. Another hit-piece by those with TDS.
That comment was obviously made in jest, but the truth is that Donald Trump lost every demographic in the US except white people.
Both Chup & Alpha Man have valid points: every election about 90 percent (give or take a couple of percentage points) of the black voters vote democrat. So by saying "white people" it's certainly not black voters that were mainly responsible for putting Trump into office. In other words it's an implied "given" that while a typical white voter is 50 percent likely to vote Republican, a typical black voter is only 10 percent likely. Thus his comment doesn't make me uncomfortable because I know how elections work in the US and for better or worse, that's just the way it is here. But Chup's article does point out that with strong black support it could be enough to give Trump a victory in a tight race. Currently blacks are about 15 percent of the US population. Ideally blacks are 15 percent of the US voting population too, all other limiting factors being relatively equal such as transportation to the voting locations, temporary incarceration, etc. etc. So if 10 percent (the flipside of 90) vote Republican that's 1.5 percent of the Republican votes, a bigger margin of victory than Trump had over Hillary. Imagine if that percentage got boosted to 20? The days of Democrats not having to work for black votes would come to an end very quickly I would think!
If the IRS, the state of New York, and New York City all of who would be involved in the Trump family's taxes never raised any flags than what is everyone yapping about again? That Trump was born into money? Yeah. We. Know. That. That Trump fibbed over a $1 million loan? Every single person on this planet who knows about Trump knows he's an egomaniac and a giant bragger. No one cares.
Donald Trump's biggest success is convincing people that he's a successful businessman. Reality is he failed more often than not.
No doubt, but white people are the biggest voting block in sheer numbers. White people are the one demographic that will "make or break" every election. It's the only demographic that you must win over.
Even if you fail in any career or occupation you are still "in the game" and gaining experience and adding to your skillset. The only way to avoid failure is to never get outside your comfort zone, to never take chances. Temporary failure is just a part of the process and a mathematical certainty if you stay in the game long enough.
So your argument is that you don't understand why so many people care about this story, because they shouldn't care about this story, because nobody cares about this story? You're really, really far down the rabbit hole by now, aren't you?
Looks like Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of NY are going to be investigating the claims made by The NYT.
Really the only people who care are people like you. And you already hate Trump. This is like during the campaign when everyone was flipping out over Trump taking a huge deduction. Three government entities have been approving Trump's taxes for years. They've audited him multiple times over the last few decades. If he had broken any laws they'd be the first ones to call him on it. So now you expect me to believe that the New York Times has proof of law breaking? That Trump was fibbing over a million dollar loan from his dad actually means something? (never believed it anyway) Or isn't it more likely that the New York Times that hates Trump has yet again stretched the truth to make a anti-Trump story? Come on...... it's like you guys are trying to get him reelected in 2020.
This may sound self serving, but I think that's the wrong takeaway.... Afterall, No Democratic nominee has won the white vote since LBJ pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Maybe, but your comment is a flat out stereotyping of white voters. You are a insulting millions upon millions of anti Trump white voters with it. Look, you know how anti-racism I am, but the problem with your comment is that it is unwittingly racist. Millions of white voters are anti-Trump and there are many black voters who voted for him. Majorities doesn’t mean you can lay the blame for the election of this awful man at the feet of white people per se. Minority communities in America have been getting away with this casual racism for years and it is not ok. Stop robbing millions upon millions of anti-Trump whites in and outside of America of their voice.
Really? So taking the black vote out of the equation for argument's sake, no Democrat has ever won the majority of the white only vote? That would entail of course beating them by X percent of the vote (the equivalent of the black votes when we take those out of the equation). But if the Democrats ever COMPLETELY pissed off enough white people to cause them to vote Republican, they would be fucked like Chuck. If the Democrats ever COMPLETELY pissed off every single black voter (just threw them under the bus in a very public manner) there's still a slight chance they could win. Matter-of-fact there could be enough fed up apolitical apathetic whites who might think "hey! Those Dems are okay after all!" and come out of the woodwork to vote Democrat. What will be interesting is in a few more decades when whites will be the minority in the US. I wonder how (or even if) this will change election politics & strategy!
Wrong. There is at least 1 person who loves Trump with all of his heart and cares really deeply about his success story.
So it isn't just me.....now AlphaMan is being taken the wrong way. As a white man I just don't see how his comment about whites is in any way offensive to an anti-Trumpite. Granted I'm white not anti-Trump so I don't have as much.....skin.... in the game. FUCK I AM HILARIOUS AT EVERY LEVEL!
You are right and I apologize. I was just kidding around and didn't mean to offend anyone. I am acutely aware that 70 million people vote for someone else other than DJT and a significant portion of them are white people.
I didn’t vote for Trump, but I understand Trump voters - I will vote for him next time. To say that the loan made people feel like he is one of them is stupid. No one feels like Trump is “one of them.” His appeal is his promises, and now, his delivery.
Even known Wizard David Duke got 6 percent of the black vote during his Senate run in the 90s. Far be it from me to shake a self righteous finger at black conservatives when I got snowed by that shit here, but the facts remain that whites overwhelmingly glossed over every other hateful thing he said and did for a vain attempt at protecting their measly assets. 10 percent of 13 percent didn't sway this outcome nearly as much as the Bernie Bros who stayed home for "principles" or those in swing states who chose to protest vote. Politics will always be a choice of "less bad." Anything else is a fairy tale that Disney should buy the adaptation rights for.
Oh, fuck off. The "Bernie bros" were rightly pissed off that Hillary got caught red handed cheating and making a mockery of the entire primary process. Rather than being mad about getting caught dems should straighten the fuck out and stop trying to rig primary elections. No one owes them their vote so maybe if Dems tried to actually earn votes and give people a reason to vote for them then voters might actually show up on election day.