And you actually had a point right up until that last part, at which point you completely undermined everything you'd just said. Right up until then, I thought you'd finally managed to pull your head out of your ass and calm the fuck down from the hysterics you were engaging in earlier, but it looks like you haven't yet.
Sen. Scott on being called a house n*gga.. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-called-him-a-house-n/?utm_term=.73c53cfe1766
You missed my point. Imagine two identical neighborhoods with 100 homes - one is all gay couples (50 percent female gays, 50 percent male gays) the other neighborhood is all straight couples. Would the all gay neighborhood have more children enrolled in school or fewer? That is my point.
That completely depends on what demographic catastrophe brought about that ludicrous separation in the first place. In other words, no, I don't think such a scenario was your point at all.
Well you thought wrong. Whether or not I articulated my point to your satisfaction is a moot point. I'm well aware of what my own point is, unless you can read my mind.
He and other members skipped it in 2000 too. So it isn't just a Trump thing. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24413-2001Jan20.html
So you’d say it’s more of a “based on his past behaviors, this guy does not represent what I believe America to be, so I’m not going to smile and make nice” kind of thing?
Frost is in a generous mood, and not just concerning tickets. "Give the guy a chance," he says of Bush. "That's my attitude. Give him a chance to set his agenda and then judge." BLASPHEMY! You are a democrat, our lord has proclaimed our superiority and unfailing accuracy in predicting future events! "Some members of the Black Caucus decided to boycott Inauguration Day; John Lewis, for instance, spent the day in his Atlanta district. He thought it would be hypocritical to attend Bush's swearing-in because he doesn't believe Bush is the true elected president." So only a democrat is legit - there's no other way for a republican to win besides cheating because the majority of the voters obviously must share his political viewpoint.....it's crazy to think otherwise! Can't everyone recognize our democrat superiority?
It really depends. Raising and having children is pretty popular for gay couples. I would say the only reason there would be a smaller ratio would be that haters have made it hard for gays to be parents. It is why if everyone were gay the human race would go on comfortably.
You do remember they lost the popular vote so you cannot say the majority of the voters in these cases because the majority of the voters wanted the other guy. That racist fantasy world you live in must be really horrible considering how much you cry about things.
Oh, I am sorry that hysterical laughter you heard was me. I was reading some of your posts and they were just so foolish I could not help myself.
Racists. Haters. Does it ever end with you people? And I don't think you should lecture others about their "crying". Honestly.
Gays got around that back in the day with turkey basters and paying a lipstick lesbian to carry the kid for nine months. Come to San Diego, and we've got one of the most family friendly Pride Parades on the west coast. Tons of couples with their children here.
So that's what it takes to make you care for a child although it is already born -- they have to have gay parents! Then you'll keep invading their privacy, rather than just trying to control the mother's body.
To name just two reasons: You often propagate hateful slogans and ideas towards gays, which are of course especially hurtful to gay kids; and you condemn mothers for considering abortions, but hardly ever mention what we could do to care for born babies that would then lessen the pressure on pregnant women to have abortions in the first place. Even when discussing kids of gay parents right here, you assume that separating kids from their parents protects them, without even mentioning how to deal with that trauma and how to care for them at all once that has happened. Your interest here is in opposing homosexuality, not considering how to care for kids.
Because, yanno, it is? It's not the only reason, but it's no coincidence that the highest rates of abortion percentage wise are black women who by now are in a third generation of a fatherless epidemic.
It has been a few years since I looked at the data, but I'm pretty sure that the typical woman who had an abortion (at least a few years ago) was part of an income level considerably above the lowest.
