I want us to nanite, stemcell, and hadron us to prosperity, but the ones that want to church everyone to prosperity are deliberately trying to sabotage the debate so even "progress", is a filthy word, and full of "commie", connotations.
That's kind of my point, they're not torched and pitchforked because of their beliefs but because they feel a need to make a big splash. WF is a small pond with several sharks, if you're going to try and be a new shark you had better come equipped. Exactly. WF has it's peanut gallery, and it's usually pretty fun to see in action, even if at times it goes too far.
And you make no distinction between religious zealots and people who are merely "religious". So far as your demonstrably concerned, all of them are idiots, regardless as to whether or not they want to "church everyone". There existence is anathema to you, and you summarily dismiss them. Cry me a river for your brand of "progress".
There is a difference between progress and 'progressives' - the former is to be welcomed, the latter have co-opted the word to justify an expanding state and tax increases and to try and negate any debate on it by painting any opposition as 'regressive'.
Well, I'm against the all-or-nothing nanny-state types. But, I think handing things all over to private industry is equally naive. Sometimes, corporations do things better, like UPS doing the mail. But, I ain't budging on the government doing the army, Blackwater's gotta go. Government has a role to play, and it can be a tricky balance, but ideologue shit on both sides doesn't help. Our fuckin' media...pppt.
You know, when I think of the way you seem to look at the world, I can't help but imagine you with a large sheet of glass in front of you, and an oil paint set at your fingertips. You paint your perspective over reality, while the rest of us on the other side of the glass are just seeing a clusterfuck of colors cluttering what kind of resembles a functioning intellect.
Great. We've now provided an image to represent his favorite cop out. He's becoming more and more like Garamet with these little mid-discussion freeze points.
Hey, hey... at least the elephant shows some talent here. The mule would plop is ass down and refuse to move.
See, and this is what's wrong with WF. This is where you're supposed to bolder Jamey's talking points with your own in order to make your side look smarter.
Generally I would agree with you, but this is what Dicky does now. I've lost faith in giving him the benefit of the doubt. Even if he legitimately debates for a little bit, when it gets down to the nitty gritty, he's worthless. When he gets called out on a point he previously made, he either twists it with a "Did I say that?", or more recently, out of what appears to be laziness, a "prove it." Sorry, Garamet, but the nutbar has lost his filling.
But in replying in an open forum, you're not replying to just one poster. Instead of personalizing it, why not just address your comments to whoever might be interested in picking up on them?
Fair enough. But Post #131 wasn't addressing Diacanu, either. It was sort of thrown out there looking for agreement. Perfect opportunity to toss in some deep thoughts of your own.
Not sure where you got looking for agreement, I was expressing an opinion on Diacanu's overuse of the "Prove It" smiley.
How many times have I used it? 4? 5? Maybe if the tools I use it on would back their shit up... Oh, wanna keep asserting shit from your dopey feelings, instead of facts? Then, I welcome your hatred.
Who the hell (a few pages back) said The South skews more conservative that liberal? That's a pretty broad statement, because it's dependant on racial demographics. Any majority black city will be heavily liberal (Democrat) and the whiter suburbs will skew conservative. Few whites will be liberal around here, so I guess that might prove statistically that The South is more conservative. Race is extremely important in politics at all levels in The South. There is little middle ground.
The overuse is not in reference to the number of times you've posted it, but the over-the-top use of it. Using it where it's either unnecessary or placed as a cop out where you know it's asking your opposer to search for one or many situations where you had fulfilled their assertment. In reference to that, not everyone saves your posts as if they had any use but to throw at you in your pursuits to convolute an debate. The point being that you offer nothing anymore. You're nothing but a word magician. A misdirection or convolution artist. You simply offer nothing to Wordforge anymore. Regardless of your disagreement of what I stand for, at least I'll discuss my position out. If you don't take any joy in expressing or explaining your point of view, then what are you doing on a discussion forum? In slight opposition to that, I can understand the position of a lurker, who simply enjoys the information, but we both know that's not you. You criticize others and offer nothing of your own that doesn't also include criticizing others. Like I said before, the appearance of your motivation is of negative origin. You spend more time degrading others rather than explaining why your ideas may aid society or help better anyone. You run on emotions, not reason. And when you do finally get going, you prove to be nothing but a soapbox social capitalist.
You believe there is no afterlife, and illogically pursue a purpose. I wouldn't tread on philosophical ground, kid. You aren't well armed.
We've had plenty of bedwetting liberal parasites here. You can't really blame us for them getting mad and running away like pussies. It's just their nature.