With his exploding rockets I would think Elon would not want to promote looking up to see his third biggest electronic dumpster fire. What is with this guy and his business proficiency at blowing up his product lines?
Surprise, surprise, the CIA is involved in the crash retrieval program and has retrieved nine crashed UFOs. So earlier this year Chuck Schumer introduced legislation to allow protection for whistleblowers in the private sector and public sector who may wish to come forward with information. This is important because this how you get the "let's see it" crowd who keep demanding proof. It's believed that companies like Lockheed-Martin houses some of these crafts. I personally believe that Robert Bigelow and Bigelow Aerospace have crafts. Bigelow himself has said in an as a matter of fact manner that aliens are among us. So if you want proof of aliens, you have to allow for people in the know to come forward without being in fear of breaking their NDA's and getting sued into oblivion. This legislation is necessary. The problem is there are certain senators and House members as well as those in the intelligence community is blocking it. There's a lot in this article and I'm not going to get to all it, but I will touch on a few things. This article seems to confirm what Bob Lazar said, that people who work on the recovered craft don't even know that it's part of recovered craft because everything is super compartmentalized. David Grusch, the whistleblower who testified earlier this year told Joe Rogan on his podcast that they basically learned how to do this from the Manhattan Project. This something I've been saying for years. Here's the part about Lockheed-Martin. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ce-UFO-retrieval-missions-whistleblowers.html According to Matt Gaetz, (yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah) he went to a military base to see something that a constituent told him about and was turned away by some military guy. Now, even if you don't believe in aliens or whatever, don't you think it's problematic that members of the House Oversight Committee can't get clearance or denied access to the things they're supposed to be overseeing? I mean who's in charge of this country We the People or the intell community? Things like this alone should get people to support this type of legislation and disclosure.
The House Oversight Committee held a press conference discussing the CIA and the blocking they're doing. They bring up some good points, even if these craft are ours, they're interfering with commercial craft and putting people in danger. As I've said before, there are designated test ranges that they can fly on, there's no need to put our own people in danger. If it's the Chinese then that's dangerous because they are engaging around our nuclear facilities. Here's the full press conference.
So I am confused. Why is FF able to run upright during drinking month? There is only so far I can suspend my disbelief, and a sober FF is going to take me out of the narrative real fast. On the other side I do look pretty good as admiral mascara.
So the committee members met with the IG and they came away believing that what David Grush said was credible. One congress committee member said that Grush about the non-human biological are inter dimensional, not aliens from another world.
Who is that in the video? Where and when was the video shot? I'll also point out that the woman you see speaking earlier in the video (around the 4 minute mark) leaves via the stairs, and then at about the 7:30 mark, you can see her exit the elevator, notice the cameras, and walk away. And absolutely nothing any of them said was in any way conclusive about anything.
That was the UAP sub committee. I don’t know exactly the names of the congress critters. I know Tim Burchette is a congressman from TN and the most vocal about the UAP’s, but they’re all congress critters that spoke to the IG of the intelligence agencies in a SCIFF and walked away with more information than they had say, six months ago. I agree that they didn’t say anything conclusive. What they are trying to figure out is what specific questions they are supposed to ask. Let’s say the White House chef has a pickle recipe that you’re trying to find out, but the White House chef got that recipe from a friend, congress can try to get that recipe from the White House chef, but because it’s in private hands, Congress can’t get that information. That’s what congress in this committee is facing. They may be able to get certain details, but they can’t get the whole recipe. So they go into a SCIFG and the chef tells them the whole recipe, well they can’t tell us that the recipe exists and they might be able to tell us the ingredients, but they can’t tell us the recipe.
Is it? How do you know? Well, that's a problem, don't you think? How do you know this? What's that tell you? The first use of the term "flying saucer" was in, what? 1947 or thereabouts? That's 70+ years people have been asking questions. There's a shitload of them to choose from. And here's where your analogy breaks the fuck down: All you need is a sample pickle. Just one. You send half of it to a lab that can analyze the pickle (lots of them out there with the tech), you give the other half to an expert chef. The lab can precisely analyze the pickle, tell you the specific variety of cucumber the pickle's made from, the ingredients (along with their proportions) needed to make it. The expert chef can taste the pickle and based on their experience, figure out the details that the analysis might have missed and even recreate the pickle even if the lab missed something (or if the lab was unable to analyze the pickle at all). Now, you want to know if those folks are actually serious when they say that they're concerned about the information? That's pretty easy. See if they advocate for increases in the budgets for things like NASA, DARPA, the NSF, and the DoD. Because those are the government bodies who have the necessary expertise to figure that kind of shit out. If they don't, then you know they're just blowing smoke up your ass. Which is why it's really important to know who those people are in the video, as well as when it was recorded, and where it was recorded.
How do I know that these are members of the UAP committee? Is this what you think is some sort of gotcha question? I have eyes and ears, I know what they look like. What this tells me is that there's an over classification problem and the Air Force has real problem stonewalling congress. The questions have to be specific to the military and the hardware that they can talk about. If they ask a vague question or a question that can be answered in a way that gives them wiggle room then they're going to get a bunch of non answers. The congressmen have civilian researchers that know more than them and will know what to look for the next time they go out in the field. The reason for this is before when the New York Times first broke this story, we didn't know much about the equipment used to track these objects, now we know more about it and much of can be bought on the market.
But you don't know their names. I don't have a fucking clue as to who these people are. If you want me to take this shit seriously, then you need to cough up some names so I can do some research on them. And? There's a whole lotta people who've said the same thing, and don't a one of them believe in aliens. You can say the same thing about every other branch of the military, as well as all the other alphabet agencies you can think of, not to mention any number of ones that we don't know exist. Doesn't mean shit when it comes to proving the existence of aliens. Do they? Why? You know who are experts at answering questions in a way that doesn't give a real answer? Politicians. Not only can they spot a bullshit answer, they know how to cut through the bullshit to force the politician to give them a real answer. You know, like this: So, there ought to be lots and lots of civilians who have tracked the objects and can present the evidence without worrying about shit being classified. So, where is it? Dude, this is just one of the threads we have here about wankers who can't keep their mouth shut about classified info. Yet nobody has leaked details about captured alien tech to the point where someone can build something, or demonstrate something that we can't do. Yet, somehow, you think that we can keep all of the shit related to alien tech a secret, despite the fact that you believe we found a crashed alien saucer at Roswell in the 40s. I am staring at this on an off-off-brand TV that I'm using as a monitor, and I paid less than $120 for this thing that's a flat-panel LCD screen. Adjusting for inflation, that's a fraction of what my parents paid for the Zenith color TV we had when I was a kid. Yet, somehow, it took almost a century for us to go from tubes to LCDs, despite the fact that we had alien tech? How does that make sense? To go back to your pickle example, suppose that your employer gave you not only the best pickle you ever tasted, but also the recipe on how to make it. Now, your employer says, "We're only going to put it on one kind of sandwich, and it's one that almost nobody buys." What are you going to do? You know that if you put the pickle on every sandwich, people are absolutely going to love it. You also know that if you sell them in jars, so people can put them on sandwiches that they make, not only will they do this, but they'll also just eat the pickles straight from the jar. Your employer is literally throwing money away by limiting the use of the pickles to only one kind of sandwich that they sell to potentially just one customer a month. Are you going to say, "I'm just going to do what my boss tells me."? Or are you going to say, "Fuck that asshole, I'm gonna get rich!"? Why should someone who understands how alien tech be any different than the person who says, "Fuck that asshole, I'm gonna get rich!"?
Oh, yeah, the signal that made him think the meteor was of interstellar origin? Seismic Rumble From an 'Alien Technology' Meteor Was Actually a Passing Truck, Scientists Say
