Would you allow your PM's to be searched by the administration?

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by The Flashlight, Jun 20, 2007.

?

Would you give permission for the admin to search/read your PM's?

  1. No, not under any circumstance

    27.8%
  2. Yes, for any reason, no prior permission needed, Elwood owns WF and can do whatever he wants

    2.8%
  3. Yes, but only if they ask my permission first, and I think the reasons are justifiable

    50.0%
  4. Yes, the security & smooth operation of WF trumps any expectation of privacy I may have in my PM's

    5.6%
  5. Fleshlight, Most Vile & Hateful member in the history of WF, power-hungry misanthrope

    8.3%
  6. teh baba

    30.6%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. The Exception

    The Exception The One Who Will Be Administrator Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    21,942
    Ratings:
    +6,317
    Most of the time, but I'm not sure what the criteria is for it...
  2. Jeff Cooper Disciple

    Jeff Cooper Disciple You've gotta be shittin' me.

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,319
    Ratings:
    +3,056
    Liet, I'll use that av for 24 hours if there's a heap of rep involved.
  3. Megatron

    Megatron Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    21,266
    Location:
    Cybertron
    Ratings:
    +105
    You are the Boi Geniass.

    Figure something out.

    And prove that Jenna is a fat lying bag of cholesterol.

    :borg:
  4. Prufrock

    Prufrock Disturbing the Universe

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,847
    Ratings:
    +3,446
    Nobody sends me PMs so I don't know what I would do. :weep:
  5. Dan Leach

    Dan Leach Climbing Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    32,366
    Location:
    Lancaster UK
    Ratings:
    +10,668
    Why should i hide anything?
    Truth is always better than deceit, and opinion doesnt really matter :)
  6. phantomofthenet

    phantomofthenet Locked By Request

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    19,287
    Location:
    :mystery:
    Ratings:
    +2,902
    I've taken it out of their hands. I've turned off PM's.

    Any future private info and conversations will be done via email. :shrug:
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. enlisted person

    enlisted person Black Swan

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    20,859
    Ratings:
    +3,627
    Now,see what ya'll have done with all your bitchng and whining. I hope you are proud.
  8. Chuck

    Chuck Go Giants!

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    17,931
    Location:
    Tea Party shithole
    Ratings:
    +8,887
    Meh.

    I rarely use the PM system.
  9. Mrs. Albert

    Mrs. Albert demented estrogen monster

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    23,685
    Ratings:
    +11,608
    I voted yes if I am asked permission and I think the reasons are justifiable, but that only goes for Elwood. I wouldn't trust anyone else reading through them. However, he should realize that he is probably going to see more of my bewbies than he ever bargained for. :lol:
    • Agree Agree x 3
  10. Josieland

    Josieland Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    :borg: I voted no! Private messages are just that.:borg:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Shakes

    Shakes With good reason

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,739
    Location:
    Personal Elysium
    Ratings:
    +1,900
    but what about they sexy pms we where gonna send each other? and the naughty pictures of my illustrating different positions for you???? and!!!! and!!! think of the countless nights! :sob:

    *shakes goes and tries to find a new pm buddy :cry:
  12. Aenea

    Aenea .

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,093
    Ratings:
    +5,889
    :calli:

    [action=Mrs. Flow]raises her hand and hopes Mrs A doesn't notice.[/action]
  13. phantomofthenet

    phantomofthenet Locked By Request

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    19,287
    Location:
    :mystery:
    Ratings:
    +2,902

    phantomofthenet2000@yahoo.com

    (grins as he calls Shake's bluff)
  14. NAHTMMM

    NAHTMMM Perpetually sondering

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    14,713
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +9,941
    oh wow


    [action=NAHTMMM]leans into a hard turn as he dives out of the thread and away from the menace of the impending spambots[/action]
  15. Mrs. Albert

    Mrs. Albert demented estrogen monster

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    23,685
    Ratings:
    +11,608
    I always notice. :P
  16. Lanzman

    Lanzman Vast, Cool and Unsympathetic Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    35,183
    Location:
    Someplace high and cold
    Ratings:
    +36,689
    lanzman@yahoo.com

    Email often. :soma:
  17. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,917
    Pardon me if this is stating the obvious, but if you don't want your PMs to be read, DON'T SAVE THEM. :doh:
  18. The Flashlight

    The Flashlight Contributes nothing worthwhile Cunt Git

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    18,023
    Ratings:
    +6,749
    PM's that have been deleted are still stored in the database, ready to be retrieved by anyone with the tech know-how to do so. The claim that this is only partially true is false. They're there.

    The only real solution is to abandon PM's and use private email.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Gagh

    Gagh Idiot.

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    Hampshire, England
    Ratings:
    +130
    Gosh, those poached eggs on toast were tasty.
  20. Phoenix

    Phoenix Sociopath

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,440
    Location:
    St Louis
    Ratings:
    +1,562
    For what it's worth, I voted "No". While I kinda trust Elwood, I do not trust Tamar
  21. Fisherman's Worf

    Fisherman's Worf I am the Seaman, I am the Walrus, Qu-Qu-Qapla'!

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    30,594
    Ratings:
    +43,004
    I voted yes, but only with my permission. Nothing really incriminating in my PM box. Just a bunch of back-and-forth PMs of me trying to get warnings overturned, plus various posters bitching about God knows what.


    Jenna was probably lying.