While I'm here: Cass, the considered veneer fools no one, you're still a fucking imbecile. BusHitlerMafiosi!!!!!1
Liet and Dinner think that last post of mine is 'dumb.' Which, more than anything, tells you whose side Liet and Dinner are on.
Islam is a religion of violence and savagery. It's written all the way through their fucking 'holy' book. The fact that Islamic believers are more fervent about that than Christians is not an indictment of Christians.
So you're not impressed with the flowery words, but you are impressed with the threatening ones. And you still won't address the 1.6 billion, or the distinction in the bolded part between that and the actions of other religionists who'll attack anywhere, anytime. Odd how you'll attack Christians, but you don't dare attack Christ himself. Funny how you'll condemn Mohammend, hyperfocus on the terrorists, but give no credit to the majority of Muslims. Smart people?
You called them 'smart people' for blaming the victims, chica. I didn't. If your skills at your usual game have gotten this rusty, best you give it up.
Post 214 sentence 1. You'll note I don't attack Spiderman or Harry Potter either. There's historical evidence for Muhammed.
So you asked for just to waste time, because you had already seen the you were asking for and simply chose to disregard what you had already seen for the purpose of ideological convenience. Typical. Why don't you be atypical, just once.
Wait, I've attacked Jesus before... "Gentle Jesus meek and mild", invented Hell as "the lake of fire". No single idea in religion has caused more spilled blood and children's tears than that. Fuck Jesus with a crucifix dildo. There, happy?
Tell us all, Chump, how frequently they amass a body count and how high their body counts are. That's what I thought. You are dismissed to shut the fuck up now.
The Islamists obviously made a serious error in targeting the cartoonists. If they'd have killed twelve mimes we'd all be saying "Fuck yeah!"
I don't give two shits that you found an article on some progressive muzzie site written by someone who would be instantly beheaded by islamo-extremists. Talk about cherry-picking. Here's a suggestion - try being intellectually honest about the topic under discussion instead of peddling your PC garbage and expecting folks to accept your MSNBC narrative regardless of how inconsistent it is with reality. Poll after poll after poll has shown that the islamo-muzzie populace is sympathetic to islamo-terrorists, whatever moral/ethical misgivings they may have concerning terrorist tactics is outweighed by the culturally accepted hatred of the Western world, and these sand primates celebrate every atrocity committed against America.
The side which thinks you are dumb for trying to make this partisan? Especially since most liberals don't say what you falsely attribute to them? You mook.
Talk about entrap yourself. Here you go.... http://www.hrw.org/reports/2010/03/28/trail-death All in the name of religion.
People shouldn't be afraid to admit that Islam is going through its Dark Ages. That being said, it doesn't look like Islam will ever reach a period of reformation. And you can't blame the west for that.
You're quoting it as if it tells people to kill infidels. It actually condemns religious persecution. Note I'm not defending Islam in any way. But it doesn't say what you think it says, and just quoting 1 verse without context, and then misreading that, just assuming it must fit your prejudice, is sloppy.