Why is that case closed? Explain it. If you "don't have to respond", explain why? In the commentary above a Christian is say exactly the opposite. You're nothing but a coward and you know it. This has noting to do with Christianity and everything to you being too intellectually weak to respond. Why don't people like @Asyncritus pull the "I don't need to respond" card? Because they have the brains to articulate their beliefs. Oh, and Dayton, iof you really didn't need to respond you would neither keep replying to my posts or trying to score points over me in other threads. You're far too obvious.
You've offered nothing to disagree with because your cowardice prevents you from rising to the challenge. Many arguments have been put to you which you've run and hid from. Above you say "try it" when I said that if I stopped using "invisible sky man" you'd wouldn't re-engage in the debate and find another excuse to bottle it. Are you proud you proved me right?
I believe Christians are superior to nonChristians. I believe that no Christian is obligated to answer the insincere inquiries of a non Christian. If we choose to answer those questions, that is our choice but hardly something we're obligated to do.
What have I "run and hidden" from? Why is not answering a question "cowardice". The only reason you say that is you are trolling.
So where do you stand on excepting life saving medical treatment from inferior people? What is your position on the charity of non-Christians? Just take it all from them and stck your fingers up in return? Everything I have read says otherwise. So explain the reasoning behind this belief. Plus, on what basis are any of my questions in this thread "insincere"? You have no credible basis for making such an accusation. Nobody is talking about obligations, but as I explain above, all you are achieving is making people think you are loathsome. The commentary above suggests your duty as a Christian is quite the contrary. Why don't you have the guts to respond to that commentary? It is from a Christian, so you can't hide behind "I don't respond to Christians" can you? Come on. No insults. No profanity. Not "inivisiable sky man". And I'm offering commentary from a Christian, who, on your terms, you would respond to. So what will your excuse be this time?
If Christians are supposed to go out and convert non believers isn't that goal substantially hindered by their belief that they're not allowed to answer questions posed by non believers about Christianity? Or is @Dayton3 just full of shit?
The discussion. You won't see me defending much of JJ Trek. I like it alright, but I'd much prefer the primeverse.
What I meant was Dayton thinks the only reason people support gay rights or say don't give a shit if they want to get married is because it's popular right now. My response to that is, I've always not given a shit, even when it wasn't popular. I disagree with Dayton on that subject. I think some people just happen to coming around on the subject or maybe, just maybe, those people have always supported gays. As for JJ Trek, Dayton might be right, I don't fucking know and really don't care.
No, fuck no. I'm saying that I don't give a shit if gays want to marry and I've always believed that, not just when it is popular.
Oh, I see the confusion. I left out a key part. I don't give a shit if gays want to marry, if they want. I don't really care what they do. But I've always believed that.
Kind of like how Muslims are allowed to lie to, disrespect, discriminate against, and cheat "infidels".
Haaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Oh my ribs!!! My ribs!! Call an ambulance, I've broken my ribs!!
You did not explain how Catholic theology differs from your theology, for example. Please explain, I am honestly interested.
The real question is have you been an obsessive prick your entire life? Oh and let me repeat the message since you don't seem to be getting it.
That how you treat people who vouch for you? You've still got a lot to learn I guess, kid. And why do you keep showing me a video of some dead dude who had Alzheimer's? Weird.
Bull. Many of us here have been defending gays since before it was "cool." I would continue to do so even if religious mouth breathers turned this country into Saudi Arabia. Mostly, between media showing a wider group of gays and people seeing more of their friends coming out, we've moved away from the bashing that used to be common even ten years ago. I don't even hear anyone using the term gay to describe something stupid in slang anymore. As others have said, I don't worry much about people like you coming to power. You and your ilk are a dying breed, like the bigots in the GOP.
Dude, are you so butthurt with me that you you can't be bothered to read the thread? He said he wanted more rules of Christianity enshrined in law. What about this about this is complicated for you?