You do know that terror attacks just don't happen because of Islam, right? That there are other geopolitical and sociological factors at play here? Or is it easier just to point to the RELIGION OF PEACE and condemn billions of people based on the actions of a relative few?
Kinda like how law abiding gun owners are demonized because the actions of a relative few? All these attacks have in common is Islam.
I wouldn't demonize law abiding gun owners. But if you're willing to demonize Muslims based on the actions of a few, I would think you'd be willing to demonize law abiding gun owners based on mass shooters. Or Christians based on abortion clinic bombings. Or black people for urban crime. Well, I bet you're willing to do at least one of those things. I'm sure of it. There are a frequent amount of terrorist attacks by people who believe in Islam. But to just say that they're doing it because their religion tells them to is embarrassingly simplistic. There are other factors. And in the US, a person is innocent until proven guilty. Deporting Muslims based on the actions of a few violates that principle and anyone espousing mass deportations should be ashamed of themselves.
Removing them all would save lives but like you have acknowledged, pissing off Muslims only turns them into terrorists, which has nothing to do with Islam.
What's andruil doing to get rid of the muzzies I wonder, I mean aside from the important job of posting lame memes on an obscure message board
Yes, he could be radicalized already. I'd report him to ICE if you still have his whereabouts. Better safe than sorry.
Hmm. I see what you mean. You could buy him a plane ticket to one of the banned countries and (fingers crossed!) maybe he won't be allowed back for 7 or so years.
why is Guyana on this list, what terrorist attacks have happened in Guyana recently? why is Singapore not on this list? Singapore is like 15% Muslim and never experiences Islamic terrorist attacks. what a stupid list
By this logic, lack of terrorist attacks in cities/countries with a Muslim population provide evidence against your point (e.g. Singapore has a substantial Muslim population but has not had any recent terrorist attacks).
You can't follow an ideology ofbevil and be noth loving anf caring. Simply being a follower of Islam precludes these things.
That’s the Israel lobby. The “Christians” in this context are really just a handful of elected officials taking bribes.
the current best estimate of resident Muslims in the U.S. of whatever citizenship is 3.3 million Since 2002, there have been 14 perpetrators of deadly terror attacks in the U.S. who are Muslim, half of those born in the U.S. Ignoring the reality that 3.3. million is a current estimate and does not account for the many others who've passed through our borders in the last 15 years, your argument is then that is that one perp in every 235,714 individuals (.004%) is an "unacceptably high" number.
Question: Where do you deport Americans to? Answer: Drop them off outside the gates of a US base in Afghanstan. Like fuck is it quote mining, and you aren't fooling anyone.
So you're saying the murderers in charge represent only a minuscule minority among the faith and their actions don't even fit the faith at all, even though they claim to be its paragons?
Excellent question. The percentage of terrorists among Muslims is two orders of magnitude smaller than the amount of murderers among Americans -- which is itself a lower bracket on the amount of peace-loving gun-owning Americans. So whatever your policies against Muslims on the basis of them being possible terrorists, adopting the same policy against Americans as possible murderers is justified more than 100 times over.
There is no limit to gun supporters. It's the price we pay for the freedom to bear arms. But the same logic doesn't apply to Muslims and terror acts, because Islam is "the other."
No. You said Christians bomb the Mid East when they get pissed off. I was correcting you. That’s the Israel lobby bribing secular governments like the US.
