It will never end

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/11/nyregion/explosion-times-square.html

Religion of peace strikes again.

But it can end.
Take the advice of your avatar, and swig your little vial.

Nope, it is what they do. The only meaningful solution is to exclude them completely as an unacc3ptably large percentage of them behave like animals.

Any attempt to drill down into this always devolves into absurdity. If "exclude" means "deport", then what do you do with Muslims who are your own citizens?

He'd probably recommend putting them in camps. Because, yanno, reasons.

I do remember his trying to square the circle on one occassion by suggesting that regardless of their being citizens, that they get sent back to the country of their ancestors. And (assuming said country can be identified) countries which refuse to take the Muslims @Dinner wants to send them ought to suffer economic and/or military consequences.

I have answered exactly the same each and every time one of you trolls asks this question despite me having answered it dozens of times. We are stuck with citizens but we can indeed decide to stop making matters worse.

Did you understand that this time or will you be back, yet again, lying and pretending not to understand? What is the major malfunction which causes you to not understand that response? @Anna also like to play little games where she asks that question yet ignores my response over and over again.

"Stuck with" implies your lot can always find another solution. Where did your people come from, again?

Do you deny saying that you'd send them back to where their forbears came from even if they were citizens, and impose punishments on those who wouldn't take them? Because I can dig it out. Wordforge has a good search function.

And even so, by your own logic, if you're "stuck" with them, then you're not excluding them and your response to the threat posed is not meaningful.

Ah, here we go.

Survived a pipe bomb strapped to his chest...accidental shaped charge?

This is a False Flag just like all the other so called "Islamic Terrorist" attacks here and in Europe. All of the "victims" are crisis actors hired by Rupert Murdoch.

That specifically was talking about noncitizen resident aliens. Also refugee noncitizens where some where whining their own cou tries don't want them vack and refuse to take them.

You sure do love out of context quote mining. Hell, the quote even said noncitizens, you liar!

Because a Democrat president never put people into camps.

Like they have been doing?

No one here is denying that a DemocratIC president made that decision. Are you advocating that subsequent presidents follow suit?

Thanks for pointing out my spelling mistake. That was so nice of you.

See, that was not a spelling, but a grammatical, mistake. Adjectives as modifiers. Don't suppose they teach that in middle school anymore.

You’re a fountain of knowledge.

That's exactly what The Pentaverate wants us to think.

Can you answer @garamet's question now?

Presidents should protect the nation from groups that pose a threat.

Do you think that should include putting people into camps?

No, just deport them. But if it’s good enough for Eisenhower, it’s good enough for me.

There are people who haven't put Garmet on ignore? Why would anyone be such a sadomasochist? Life is too short for that nonsense.

You mean there are people on WF who aren't chickenshits like you? Even Dayton reads and responds to my posts.

Chickenshit.

I only put people who insult me every chance they get on ignore, @garamet doesn't do that.

So I know a few Muslims, and they don't seem to be into killing or terrorizing. They even have a cat. Do they have to be deported?

Funny thing is that every one of supposedly "tolerant of islam" people here will also watch every muslim like a hawk in their personal lives, and rightfully so.