UKForge: Man Leaves For Vacation, Returns To Find 15 Weird Flatmates

Here's another story on the guy:

Indeed.

I really don't know why I come to this board. Its just full of trolling morons who are no longer interested in actually talking over an issue.

I routinely condemn Islamic extremism yet I am a msulim apologist because I refuse to behave like an ignorant, stereotyping bigot.

I come out and explicitely criticise a law in this country and then I am branded a scumbag lawyer, who, it is implied, sides with the squatters, just because I think its important that a issue be looked at with accuracy.

I mean, this is just absurd.

It used to be that you could come here and have sensible argument and debate. This purile nonsense amounts to nothing more than a lot of internet politicians desperate to build up their machismo by ganging together and throughing inaccuracies against those with different just so that can all pat themselves on the back and pretend that the delusions solely invented by their on boorish rhetoric is somehow the truth.

Ye fucking gods. That's tripping my blood pressure from across the damned ocean. If that's my house, I'm kicking my fucking door, and violence will ensue.

And Chup, the ridiculous obstacles to owning firearms over there are undeniably pertinent to this discussion, so you can get fucked.

Another story?




Its from the same newspaper you moron. The London Evening Standard is the free London handout printed by the same publisher as the Daily Mail.

Oh and he's gay so maybe he can stay with Dan Leach if he gets tired of his sisters.

Do you know that the majoity of gun licences in the UK are applied for and issued for self-defence?

Has it occured to you that maybe the British public doesn't have the absolute obsession with owning personal armouries like your lot do?

Has it occurred to you that doggedly portraying Americans as psychotic gun-fetishist cowboys who shoot each other over the slightest offense does not make you look clever or help your credibility in the slightest?

I read the article. I didn't bother slogging my way through the comments section to get all the way down to the bottom of the page just to see a tiny link to the Daily Mail.

Plus it is another story you fucking cunt so even if I knew it was from the same organization my statement is still correct.

What's the fucking matter with you? You saying that someone shouldn't get a little pissed off if they come into a thread, criticise the law everyone is up in arms about and state that the offence should be criminalised, and then get accused of supporting the offenders?


Oh do fuck off with that shit.

Listen you spineless pacifistic shemale, this is simple logic. When overwhelmed by superior numbers, you need an efficient means of leveling the playing field. I'm sure you and Chup would just bend over and take some unwashed squatter cock up your prolapsed rear entrances while the issue slowly worked its way through the courts, but for people with at least one descended testicle that kind of shit doesn't sit very well.

Its kinda easy to get the impression when the first reply in this thread makes it a thing about guns, suggesting that its OK to threaten or shoot someone in a non self-defense situation.

My credibility in terms of what?

I respond to the attitudes of those on this board, not the American public as a whole.

Perhaps the twats here are giving your country a bad name as the description in your post certainly applies to a lot here.

Oh yes, which is why in about 5 posts now I have expressly stated that the present law is nonsense and the offence needs to be crimalised thus prompting immediate arrest.


Can you not read? Or is the retard act just for your own amusement?

Defense of property is defense of self. I'm not suggesting anyone shoot first and ask questions later. I'm saying the owner is within his rights to kick in his own fucking door and march them all out at gunpoint. Only if one of them made a threatening move would someone get shot.

In terms of not being provoked to a pissy little tantrum, apparently.

You respond to your cherry-picked, self-serving, willful perception. Nothing more.

No one has advocated walking in and shooting the squatters. Option 1 is to call PD and have them removed and arrested. Option 2 is to go in and tell them to get the fuck out. Option 3 is to remove them by force from your house and property. If they resist and your life is in danger as a result then you have your gun for self defense.

Ooooh. "Nonsense." "Criminalized." Settle down there, killer.

Would you or would you not skulk away with your tail between your legs and wait for the courts to sort it out?

What sort of answer are you looking for?

I would do what the law would allow me to do. That's it. If I start committing crimes I don't get to work in the law? Get it?

So, if I don't agree with something, can you please advise me of what other non-criminal solution you propose other than calling for the law to be criminalised?

You seem to have all the answers bwanna. Or perhaps your reply will just be some more colourful bile.

Option 1 is not possible since it is not a crminal offence. This is why I have proposed making it a criminal offence as it would allow immediate arrest and detention.

Option 2 is possible.

Option 3 is not possible since it is not a criminal offence. This is why I have proposed making it a criminal offence since option 3 would be superflous if they were already arrest by force by the police.

So can you explain me exactly what it is that people are disagreeing with me on?

I see that TwatForge continues to be pleased with itself self induced falling membership.

Do you know that this board has a quarter of the activity it once had, and the reason for that is twats like you who take away any interest in the place.

I really don't know why you want this board to go from being debate board to one where everyone agrees with everyone else and then sucks each other's cock.

It's hard to not turn this into a "its because you don't have guns" thread when:
1. My first thought is that if I got in my house and noticed a home invader, I would definitely pull out my gun and clear the house.
2. You guys don't have guns. Your police don't have guns unless they're in special units, and owning guns is so difficult in your country that your Olympic firearms teams no longer train in their own country. You guys have guns like Volpone has an MRI or Xray machine - technically possible, but so difficult as to be outside the realm of the expected.

These squatters have violated this man's castle. They should be drawn and quartered.

Long gone. Now it's all hate-the-Muslims and hunt-the-Obama.

That's the problem, right there. Sometimes the law is wrong and must be disobeyed.

Not possible? For fuck's sake, man. Do you really grow up so hopelessly conditioned to submit and defer over there?

Well, you do realise that without guns their penises fall off, right?

You have to understand their plight.

It's because of the Mexicans.

So are you saying that it is advisable to give up my entire career and source of income in favour of breaking the law?

So in your world, I break the law to get my home back and then lose it once my source of income and liberty have been taken away.

Great solution.

I can really see the benefits of this in comparison with calling for criminalisation. How foolish of me.

You're one to talk about Twatforge when one only has to look at a average post of yours to realize you're a founding member of said organization.

You've no business talking about how you want to debate when you are just as fast at slinging "twattery" about the board as anyone else.