Wordforge

The only thing missing is the words..Ban them!!

D'UR!!

Nowhere in any of those posts was a ban proposed. Maybe you need your reading glasses.

Says the guy who has created a Broken Family all by himself.

In other words, of course, you cannot prove your claim.

Like your old girlfriend garamet.

Using the word nigger like you do might motivate someone else to break the rules.

"I apologize. ... I'm sorry. ....I'm sorry we had to defend ourselves against an unwarranted attack. I'm sorry that your crew was stupid enough to fire on a station filled with a quarter million civilians, including your own people. And I'm sorry I waited as long as I did before I blew them all straight to hell. As with everything else, it's the thought that counts."

No, you stupid asshole, it isn't said there to DIRECTLY ban them, but to run them away so they don't return, which in other words mean you would ban them if you had the power or privilege to do so.

I am using Garamet's logic by the way. You should appreciate that.

Is that a threat? Are you threatening me, Mewa?

Or are you trying to deflect the question posed towards you?

Yes.

Cowardly, like your ilk, as always.

Make it happen...if people agree with you there will be an uprising against those you want gone.


Of course we all know what you really want is them banned because you're not going to get support from more than one or two in your crusade.

I don't want him gone, and I don't want him banned, and I have said so several times. What is your problem with understanding this?

So I am right in saying that you argue for rather than against those bans. Check.

So I repeat,

"Absolutely no-one has suggested banning people for chasing others away.

Infact, the only people arguing for bans lately are the same who claim that no-one is being forced to leave."

Can we please try and take the fighting elsewhere...it would be nice if this could be about Wordforge and discussing Wordforge and not more poo flinging...thank you.

That's what I said in a nutshell. Of course, the likes of henryhill, packard and their entire ilk would like to either ignore or not accept that fact.

Your the one hiding behind your mommys skirts. How was that julab?

I don't think henryhill is suggesting unwarranted banning of anyone. It looks like a straw man argument to me. If he doesn't explicitly say it or ask for it, what right does anyone have to put words in his mouth in order to insult him?

And henryhill, I'm defending your right to say you don't like certain people and would like to run them off the board. You can even go right ahead and do it for all I care. I just think the current discussion is futile on your part, is doing nothing to help your cause, and maybe you (and the rest of us, with luck) should go back to discussing things from a logical point of view instead of kneejerking insults whenever we see a specific username.

Too many 'parody' threads.

Too many threads with an article without any real commentary from the original poster.

Too little substance.

You keep flinging insults and expect me to back down?

You are a Stupid Nigger.

Elsewhere on the board, not elsewhere on the Internet Packard.

You're a coolie fag.

I was not poo-flinging...that is what it looked like henryhill was essentially saying to me.

Calling me illogical titles won't make me that.

But you, forever, will remain a Nigger.

Show remaining rep.

Consolidate a couple rooms.


Ban those ideologically opposed to henry and co.

Ok, Apu.

Uncle Albert needs to come back.

Mrs. Albert should be made a moderator.

Yeah. I've just waded through all of it.

Y'all correct me if I'm wrong. I see Side A saying, "Everyone should rise up and tell some people to STFU." I'm seeing the Side B saying, "So you want 'em banned?" Side A retorts, "No. Everyone should rise up and tell some people to STFU. No administrative move is necessary." Side B is then saying, "No."

So, instead of being at an impasse and trying to move forward, we're locked into

^^^You see it that way?

HH has pretty blatantly said the membership should rise up and get rid of people like Sokar and his buddies.

If what happened to garamet doesn't count as harrassment, then what does?

You have GOT to be kidding me.

Nobody 'harassed' her. We just called her on her BS.

What about her harassing others then?

She took shots at KIRK for two years when he wasn't even an active poster here.

What do you call it when she does it? Because she will keep doing it and doing it when her opponent has stopped. What is that?