I'll drive blind if you promise to walk across the road Georgia style - at night, in the rain, wearing dark clothing with no crosswalk.
Mine makes me look a drunk who's been sleeping under a bridge. You know the pictures of guys you see in the picture under the headline "Elderly Homeless Man Stabbed Outside Homeless Shelter".
well that explains the double standard! I knew there had to be a valid reason, because liberals would never, ever do anything unfair or biased. Thanks for clearing that up.
No tap dancing. Dig through my posts and you'll find that I don't cite them terribly often and that I don't give a lot of credence to opinion pieces, regardless of their source. I dropped the tweet (without comment, you'll notice) because I found the numbers the article cited to be interesting. Were I a partisan hack, I'd have cited the tweet and screamed, "See! See! This means the majority of people want him gone!"
if I said what you just said I'd be a "whiney bitch" according to leftforge. Not saying you are - I really don't care what sources people use because sources are just a "jumping off point" anyway. I just think it's very telling how leftforge in general is so cherry- pickingly biased at any given time, but they can't see it or don't want to see it.
The problem is, however, you don’t jump. You just say, “I can’t understand! It’s too complex! I’m just an idiot, but not as big of an idiot as Hillary!”
Nope. Sorry. I have zero interest in performing oral sex on your wife/mother. See how easy that is to do? Anyways, while you’re busy humping a dusty corpse, I’m going to pay attention to what your fellow travelers are up to since they seem to want a war. Granted, they might not do this if they could fuck their own mother like you do, but some might consider them to be men of action in comparison to you. You know, because they get out of the house more often.
Although you'd think a lot of them would want that. For the Republicans who aren't irredeemable scumbags, they should be for anything that might help get the guy's stink off of their party. And for Cruz, Hawley and the rest ... well, obviously they can't vote for it. But they stand to benefit if other Republicans vote for it and it passes, because their "Trump Lite" act won't get them anywhere in presidential politics if Trump himself is still sucking all the oxygen out of the room.
Don't get me wrong. I obviously am in favor of Trump's second impeachment and removal from office. But I don't think the position that it is not worth trying impeach Trump with two weeks left is inherently stupid. I disagree with the following, but I can see how somebody could reasonably believe any or all of it: 1. Now that he has acknowledged his defeat and has Republicans turning their backs on him, there is a limit to how much harm he can do in the next two weeks, so there is no need to impeach him and remove him from office. 2. Congress will not be able to actually impeach and remove Trump from office within 14 days, both because the current makeup of Congress and because the nature of Congress is to not act quickly. Therefore, spending time and energy on an effort doomed to fail and where he will be gone anyways is wasteful. 3. Even assuming that Trump represents a threat these last couple weeks AND Congress can impeach him in a timely fashion, that doesn't necessarily mean that Congress SHOULD impeach him and remove him from office. Impeaching him and removing him from office will upset many of the 70+ million who just voted for him and generally cause more trouble than it's worth. Mind you, I don't know if any of this is oldfella's logic or what. .
... facepalm. ...SMH. wtf... There is no such thing as "authorized" or "unauthorized" news source. I provided, with @spot261's assistance, the ability to find a "reliable" news source. Can we say that? Say it with me - reee -lie -uh -bul. Definition of reliable - "consistently good in quality or performance; able to be trusted" That means, the news source has been vetted as having a certain criteria - such as link to the AP/Reuters news report, links to supporting documents, opinions backed up from factual sources ... and that's only a few of the myriad of qualities assessed when rating a news source as "reliable".
He's saying that Wordforge has "authorized/unauthorized" various news outlets, which is incorrect. We just point out when he doesn't share links to credible ones.
Already on probation for having an inappropriate (but apparently nonsexual) relationship with a jail inmate. She gone.