Reactionary Radical Eliminationists vs. Trans

UA, I've found your tribe!

The silver lining here is that, in an objective court (I know, I know) this kind of transparent shit is de facto proof you are legislating against a class of people, not against a disapproved procedure.

So no gynecologists for minors? The fuck?

They've absolutely lost their minds. Cognitive dissonance from the fact they support the clergy that does most of the raping, and have quite a few of their own number on their side. But Demo-crats HAVE to be worse, so whatever they support they must oppose. Morons.

UA gets all his pink hair shit from The Critical Drinker, and that meathead puts on a fake gravelly voice, and then pitches it further down in editing.
So, he's using digital technology to correct the birth defect of having tiny balls.
Plus, he stole his whole review style from Plinkett, so that's him correcting the birth defect of having no talent.
Ironically, that shit's faker than pink or blue hair, and UA ain't saying dick about it.
Wonder why...

That's 87 Republicans who hate trans people, but like looking at underage girls with big bazongas.

What do you suppose their browser histories are like?

The hypocrisy is real. In reality no one should be getting tit jobs at 16. Wait until you're an adult

Absolutely they shouldn't, and their parents should answer for it.

With jail time, and financial destruction, and psychological torture.
And some of that last one for the kids too.
And let's throw some book burning, and threatening Walgreens in there, y'know, just for shits and giggles.

What?

nazi book burnings were full of gender research stuff, not unlike today withthe war on woke

walgreens, well, it's America so I imagine someone threatening to bomb one over birth control, let alone enabling HRT, isn't a deep dive.

My personal belief is that sixteen year olds shouldn't be getting boob jobs, but I don't know if I'm comfortable with the government all out banning them.

Anti-abortion politicians are threatening to financially destroy drug stores for selling abortifacients, even in abortion safe states, lest someone cross state lines for them.
Not directly connected....but c'mon, they'd do it for hormones too.

Cool, now explain why without sounding like a shitty little transphobe. And remember, we can see your old posts on the subject of surgical procedures for minors, and the subject of minors altering their bodies because you think adults are pressuring them to do so.

I have a cousin who got a nose job in the summer before her Jr. year in high school - in 1978.

Didn't send anyone to their fainting couch

But see, this thread isn't about what you, O Common Man, think - it's about what right wing politicians are DOING.

Which is advancing an eliminationist agenda.

Somewhat of a tangent and yet not:

A single judge could outlaw the abortion pill nationwide next week. (slate.com)

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, it promised to “return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” In virtually every instance in which it’s been returned to the people, which has mostly happened by ballot initiative and referendum, the people have acted to protect reproductive rights. Perhaps that explains why less than a year after the fall of Roe, conservative activists are trying to put the issue of abortion access into the hands of a single man for whom no one ever voted: a federal judge in Texas named Matthew Kacsmaryk. In the coming weeks, there is a very real possibility that Kacsmaryk will single-handedly outlaw medication abortion in all 50 states

--------------------
But your point is valid - SCOTUS lets him do this they will let him do basically anything he wants as they have so far. In the abortion case they have neither valid standing or a rational case - and if he does as expected he'd be introducing chaos not just as it applies to the medicine but also to the legal principle of standing.

There is ZERO doubt the same dude - who previously, Kacsmaryk served as deputy general counsel at the far-right First Liberty Institute, where he fought LGBTQ equality, abortion, and contraception. (He once said that being transgender is a “delusion” and scorned “secular libertines” who sacrifice children to their “erotic desires.”) would not be happy to do the same thing with HRT (and not just for minors) Since his confirmation, he has gained a reputation as perhaps the most lawless jurist in the country.

Anyway, good for her.

I got a free nose job in high school and no one even thought about throwing that kid in jail. At least the doctor waits for you to ask and gives you some pain pills.

Why is it that no one gives a fuck about people who assault kids every day, but if some kid wants to wear a dress and get some boobs UA and @Bill Carson need a safe space and a box of tissues because of their PTSD?

And it is possible to disagree with you on some particular point without supporting them by default.

and this ain't one of'em.

you've shown that by just how badly you'll try to twist the discussion to being over the "tax payers dime", "special privileges", and "thought policing".

at least have the courage to own your convictions rather than sneak around the obvious.

What I refuse to "own" is any distortion of my convictions. I state myself plainly and there is no need for "creative interpretation," but if you are unclear on my meaning, ASK instead of making shit up.

why? you've never offered me that courtesy while distorting mine.

besides there isn't a need to distort what you say. you've shown your ass every time you type.

Bullshit twice over. You are interchanging what you prefer to believe with objectively verifiable fact.

"Derp derp irony meter derp! I'm clever! "

Possible? Sure.

While repeating many of the same talking points and hyperbolic phrases the eliminationists use? Doubtful.

Have.
You called me lazy for not using the search function, then linked me to a thread you didn't post in.
Tell another one, Uncle Santos.

No, fucktard. There are multiple pages and you couldn't be bothered.

"I heard that phrase from someone I dislike. Your argument is invalid without the need to elaborate. "