The judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial is a hero

I'm no lawyer, so I feel like I should ask... was Rosenbaum found guilty of child molestation in a court of law and sentenced to be executed in the street by a panicky teenager? Is that why you're bringing this up?

Related: I bet there was at least one pedo among the 9/11 victims, does America owe bin Laden a posthumous medal of honour?

One of the two who were shot, who had served his time and wasn't actively molesting kids at the time KR killed him.

Funny how Chaos celebrates this, but has no rage for the guy that got no trial for impregnating a ten year old in Ohio who was forced to carry to term. He definitely celebrated a child being turned into an incubator by a child rapist.

Chaos is a terrible perfect model of a Bible-following Christian.

Oh ok, so one of the guys that got shot spent a decade in prison after being convicted of sexual conduct with a minor

What's Federal Farmer's implication here, that this guy deserved to die and isn't subject to the same laws and protections that us non child molesters are?

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

Rosenbaum's disgusting past is irrelevant as it played no role in the events.

But his belligerence on that night got him (IMHO) rightly shot.

You'd think so, but the Rittenhouse fanboys on social media won't stop bringing it up as "proof" that Marso Jr. was acting in self defense.

Yet @Ten Lubak brings up Rittenhouse’s post arrest behavior as if that’s relevant to the case and you keep insisting he’s guilty despite overwhelming evidence that suggests otherwise, but Canadians aren’t partisan.

Learn how to read boy

Rittenhouse's white power sign flashing, girl beating behavior isn't relevant to the case. At all

My point was that hitching your wagon to this guy says a lot about the type of person you are

It's fine to support self defense, I do, but I can support self defense and not support who this guy is at the same time

Meanwhile you're stumbling over yourself to post Snopes articles to defend who this guy is. Like a cunt

Stop trying to drag us near perfect Canadians down to your shitty level. We don't exist in the same atmosphere as you do

IMHO there's a much lower bar for saying "that person didn't deserve to get shot to death in the middle of the street" than to claim "that shooter is a good dude and my personal hero."

No. His charge was a generic charge which I don't remember exactly, but whatever it is, could just be he was 18 and his girlfriend was 17. Whatever the charge was, it didn't mean he was an adult molesting small children.

I've just been informed that 6 area schools will be going back to virtual learning in anticipation of the results of the verdict - regardless of which way it goes.

What? No, you're way off, that's not true at all

https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/11/rittenhouse-victims-records/

Ok so @Jenee is actually defending a child molester, but I need a ruling on if she counts or not because she's just so fucking stupid

No, she doesn't count.

Jenee never counts due to a combination of stupidity, questionable romantic choices, and her tendancy to post while day drinking.

If that's true, then apparently, I do not recall correctly. So, fuck you too.

Don't get all pissy at me because you fucked up

You deleted the posts but you forget some of us have the ability to see deleted posts

I forgot nothing. I know exactly what I said, and you told two lies, so stuff it.

Since @Shirogayne is obviously lying and you're obviously telling the truth, I'm sure you'd be okay with her showing the rest of us the content of those deleted posts that probably don't even exist because she's lying, right?

You can't be serious. The damage done in Kenosha is not a matter of opinion or debate.

How many people were killed or got shot the night Kyle was there, other than the people that were killed or got shot by Kyle himself?

He made direct acknowledgement about it here

A thinking being should be capable of recognizing that right and wrong, guilt and innocence, are not dependent on whether we find a person likeable or worthy of sympathy. Defending his rights is not defending the person. Asserting he is not guilty of murder is not proclaiming undying love for the individual. Making it a superficial popularity contest is a childish and reductive way of looking at the situation, and not worthy of any serious consideration.

Shit like this makes me dread the prospect of jury duty, because I just know I'll end up contending with some vacuous fucktard who actually expects to be taken seriously when they defend their position with "He made a gesture in a picture, which I choose to interpret in the worst possible way so I can hate him forEVAR" or "I heard he hit a girl."

Roughly the number of people who attacked him. And I notice you can't acknowledge the undeniable amounts of destruction.

Yeah, that's why most of us are against police brutality. That's why people keep protesting.

And yet the bulk of the support I see for Rittenhouse online is exactly that, praising the kid as a hero for killing a pedo and sticking it to the leftists and uppity blacks.

How many times have you made blanket judgments against "purple hair gender enthusiasts" or labelled every protester exercising their constitutionally protected rights as an evil rioter only there to cause death and destruction?

"Only there to cause death and destruction" dishonestly exaggerates anything I have actually said, and you know it.

And if I actually sit in a jury, my disdain for fashionable Twitter activists and their uniform code will not affect my vote. I will decide on law and evidence, as instructed.

You know how to use the search function, you know how to use the quote function, you know how to copy and paste. Go ahead, prove me wrong. Show us your reasonable unbiased descriptions of the protesters. I'll wait.

Everyone is biased somehow, but you're the worst sort of biased because you consider yourself above such flaws.

I'm surprised the jury wasn't sequestered. How are they possibly avoiding news about it?